Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25711358›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Gender differences in suicide prevention responses: implications for adolescents based on an illustrative review of the literature.

Emma Hamilton, Bonnie Klimes-Dougan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Scoping review of 30 years of suicide prevention in university students around the world: efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Effects of Financial Expenditure of Prefectures/Municipalities on Regional Suicide Mortality in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Trends in Suicide Mortality in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina - 2010-2020.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Trend of years of life lost due to suicide in Iran (2006-2015).International journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma HamiltonEducational Psychology Department, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station Austin, TX 78712, USA. emmahamilton@utexas.edu.
Bonnie Klimes-DouganDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. klimes@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are well-documented gender differences in adolescent suicidal behavior; death by suicide is more common in males, while nonfatal suicide attempts are more common among females. Over the past three decades, researchers have documented the effectiveness of a myriad of suicide prevention initiatives. However, there has been insufficient attention to which types of suicide prevention interventions are effective in changing attitudes and behaviors for young males and females. In this review of the literature, we consider common examples of primarily universal suicide prevention programs from three implementation settings: school-based, community-based, and healthcare-based. Our purpose is to delineate how the potential gender bias in such strategies may translate into youth suicide prevention efforts.

methodsResearch in which gender was found to moderate program success was retrieved through online databases.

resultsThe results that feature programming effects for both males and females are provocative, suggesting that when gender differences are evident, in almost all cases, females seem to be more likely than males to benefit from existing prevention programming.

conclusionsWe conclude by considering recommendations that may benefit males more directly. Implications for adolescent suicide prevention in particular are discussed. Personalization of suicide intervention is presented as a promising solution to reduce suicide rates.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSuicide

Identifiers

PMID25711358
PMCPMC4377906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.