Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25710560›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in surface water and soil associated with commercial maize (corn) fields in southwestern Ontario.

Arthur Schaafsma, Victor Limay-Rios, Tracey Baute, Jocelyn Smith, Yingen Xue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Changes in the Endophytic Bacterial Community ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment?Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Supplying honey bees with waterers: a precautionary measure to reduce exposure to pesticides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur SchaafsmaDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
Victor Limay-RiosDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
Tracey BauteOntario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
Jocelyn SmithDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
Yingen XueDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada.
University of Guelph · CAMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoid insecticides have come under scrutiny for their potential unintended effects on non-target organisms, particularly pollinators in agro-ecosystems. As part of a larger study of neonicotinoid residues associated with maize (corn) production, 76 water samples within or around the perimeter of 18 commercial maize fields and neighbouring apiaries were collected in 5 maize-producing counties of southwestern Ontario. Residues of clothianidin (mean = 2.28, max. = 43.60 ng/mL) and thiamethoxam (mean = 1.12, max. = 16.50 ng/mL) were detected in 100 and 98.7% of the water samples tested, respectively. The concentration of total neonicotinoid residues in water within maize fields increased six-fold during the first five weeks after planting, and returned to pre-plant levels seven weeks after planting. However, concentrations in water sampled from outside the fields were similar throughout the sampling period. Soil samples from the top 5 cm of the soil profile were also collected in these fields before and immediately following planting. The mean total neonicotinoid residue was 4.02 (range 0.07 to 20.30) ng/g, for samples taken before planting, and 9.94 (range 0.53 to 38.98) ng/g, for those taken immediately after planting. Two soil samples collected from within an conservation area contained detectable (0.03 and 0.11 ng/g) concentrations of clothianidin. Of three drifted snow samples taken, the drift stratum containing the most wind-scoured soil had 0.16 and 0.20 ng/mL mainly clothianidin in the melted snow. The concentration was at the limit of detection (0.02 ng/mL) taken across the entire vertical profile. With the exception of one sample, water samples tested had concentrations below those reported to have acute, chronic or sublethal effects to honey bees. Our results suggest that neonicotinoids may move off-target by wind erosion of contaminated soil. These results are informative to risk assessment models for other non-target species in maize agro-ecosytems.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidFresh WaterGuanidinesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOntarioOxazinesSoilSoil PollutantsSolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryThiamethoxamThiazolesWater Pollutants, ChemicalZea maysclothianidinGuanidinesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOxazinesSoilSoil PollutantsThiamethoxamThiazolesWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID25710560
PMCPMC4339550
OpenAlexW2001044954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.