Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25710530›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2015

It takes a village: constructing the neurogenic niche.

Christopher S Bjornsson, Maria Apostolopoulou, Yangzi Tian, Sally Temple

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher S BjornssonNeural Stem Cell Institute, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.
Maria ApostolopoulouNeural Stem Cell Institute, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.
Yangzi TianSUNY Polytechnic Institute, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, Albany, NY 12203, USA.
Sally TempleNeural Stem Cell Institute, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA. Electronic address: sallytemple@neuralsci.org.
Neural Stem Cell Institute · USSUNY Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Quantifying Changes in Neural Stem Cell Lineages in the Aging NicheR01AG041861 · NIA · REGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI COHEN, ANDREW ROBERT, TEMPLE, SALLY · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many features of neurogenesis during development and in the adult are intrinsic to the neurogenic cells themselves, the role of the microenvironment is irrefutable. The neurogenic niche is a melting pot of cells and factors that influence CNS development. How do the diverse elements assemble and when? How does the niche change structurally and functionally during embryogenesis and in adulthood? In this review, we focus on the impact of non-neural cells that participate in the neurogenic niche, highlighting how cells of different embryonic origins influence this critical germinal space.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsStem Cell Niche

Identifiers

PMID25710530
PMCPMC4886554
OpenAlexW2130869735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.