Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25710378›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Transcriptome analysis of resistant and susceptible alfalfa cultivars infected with root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita.

Olga A Postnikova, Maria Hult, Jonathan Shao, Andrea Skantar, Lev G Nemchinov

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Combating Root-Knot Nematodes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RNA-Seq of Cyst Nematode Infestation of Potato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Root-Knot Nematode Resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. EndophyticJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga A PostnikovaUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Maria HultUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Nematology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Jonathan ShaoUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Andrea SkantarUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Nematology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Lev G NemchinovUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Beltsville Agricultural Research Center · USPlant (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematodes are one of the major limiting factors in alfalfa production. Root-knot nematodes (RKN, Meloidogyne spp.) are widely distributed and economically important sedentary endoparasites of agricultural crops and they may inflict significant damage to alfalfa fields. As of today, no studies have been published on global gene expression profiling in alfalfa infected with RKN or any other plant parasitic nematode. Very little information is available about molecular mechanisms that contribute to pathogenesis and defense responses in alfalfa against these pests and specifically against RKN. In this work, we performed root transcriptome analysis of resistant (cv. Moapa 69) and susceptible (cv. Lahontan) alfalfa cultivars infected with RKN Meloidogyne incognita, widespread root-knot nematode species and a major pest worldwide. A total of 1,701,622,580 pair-end reads were generated on an Illumina Hi-Seq 2000 platform from the roots of both cultivars and assembled into 45,595 and 47,590 transcripts in cvs Moapa 69 and Lahontan, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis revealed a number of common and unique genes that were differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant lines as a result of nematode infection. Although the susceptible cultivar showed a more pronounced defense response to the infection, feeding sites were successfully established in its roots. Characteristically, basal gene expression levels under normal conditions differed between the two cultivars as well, which may confer advantage to one of the genotypes toward resistance to nematodes. Differentially expressed genes were subsequently assigned to known Gene Ontology categories to predict their functional roles and associated biological processes. Real-time PCR validated expression changes in genes arbitrarily selected for experimental confirmation. Candidate genes that contribute to protection against M. incognita in alfalfa were proposed and alfalfa-nematode interactions with respect to resistance are discussed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsComputational BiologyHost-Parasite InteractionsMedicago sativaPlant CellsPlant RootsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeTylenchoidea

Identifiers

PMID25710378
PMCPMC4339843
OpenAlexW2012941000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.