Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25710304›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

Hearing in Drosophila.

Jörg T Albert, Martin C Göpfert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deafness due to loss of a TRPV channel eliminates mating behavior inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sphingolipids in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  11. Local prothoracic auditory neurons in Ensifera.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Nanchung and Inactive define pore properties of the native auditory transduction channel inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanosensory neuron regeneration in adultDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Temperature synchronization of theCommunications biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jörg T AlbertEar Institute, University College London, 332 Gray's Inn Rd, London WC1X 8EE, UK. Electronic address: joerg.albert@ucl.ac.uk.
Martin C GöpfertDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, University of Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: mgoepfe@gwdg.de.
University College London · GBUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L02084X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissection of the Drosophila auditory system has revealed multiple parallels between fly and vertebrate hearing. Recent studies have analyzed the operation of auditory sensory cells and the processing of sound in the fly's brain. Neuronal responses to sound have been characterized, and novel classes of auditory neurons have been defined; transient receptor potential (TRP) channels were implicated in auditory transduction, and genetic and environmental causes of auditory dysfunctions have been identified. This review discusses the implications of these recent advances on our understanding of how hearing happens in the fly.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaHearing

Identifiers

PMID25710304
PMCPMC4582067
OpenAlexW2021618315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.