SynthesisBioMed research international2015
Predictive value of interim PET/CT in DLBCL treated with R-CHOP: meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Pooled it
- Interim PET response of Pola-R-CHP predicts outcome in previously untreated CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic role of FDG-PET in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with CD3-CD20 directed bispecific antibodies: a multicentric analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of interim PET/CT in GCB and non-GCB DLBCL: comparison of the Deauville five-point scale and the ΔSUVmax method.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- FDG-PET/CT in the Monitoring of Lymphoma Immunotherapy Response: Current Status and Future Prospects.Cancers · 2023Review
- Prognostic impact of soluble CD163 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Haematologica · 2021Article
- FDG PET/CT parameters and correlations with tumor-absorbed doses in a phase 1 trial ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Early Interim Chemotherapy Response Evaluation by F-18 FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Progression Free Survival and Predictor of Recurrence in DLBCL patients with Negative Interim 18FDG PET/CT Using Standardized Imaging and Reporting Protocols.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Role ofGastroenterology research and practice · 2017Article
- Advantages and disadvantages of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in carcinoma of unknown primary.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Whole-body MRI in paediatric oncology.La Radiologia medica · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy.
methodsWe searched for articles published in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Scopus, and Ovid database from inception to March 2014. Articles related to interim PET/CT in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy were selected. PFS with or without OS was chosen as the endpoint to evaluate the prognostic significance of interim PET/CT.
resultsSix studies with a total of 605 cases were included. The sensitivity of interim PET/CT ranged from 21.2% to 89.7%, and the pooled sensitivity was 52.4%. The specificity of interim PET/CT ranged from 37.4% to 90.7%, and the pooled specificity was 67.8%. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 1.780 and 0.706, respectively. The explained AUC was 0.6978 and the Q* was 0.6519.
conclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of interim PET/CT in predicting the outcome of DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy were not satisfactory (52.4% and 67.8%, resp.). To improve this, some more work should be done to unify the response criteria and some more research to assess the prognostic value of interim PET/CT with semiquantitative analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.