Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25709999›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2015

Anthropometric predictive equations for estimating body composition.

Mohammad Reza Salamat, Ahmad Shanei, Amir Hossein Salamat, Mehri Khoshhali, Mahdi Asgari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of maternal central adiposity on infant anthropometry and perinatal morbidity: A systematic review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2020
    Review
  10. Anthropometric Indices and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor in Predicting Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - A Prospective Study in Indian Population.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Reza SalamatDepartment of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmad ShaneiDepartment of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amir Hossein SalamatDepartment of Research and Development, Isfahan Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Body Composition Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mehri KhoshhaliDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Health School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mahdi AsgariDepartment of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecise and accurate measurements of body composition are useful in achieving a greater understanding of human energy metabolism in physiology and in different clinical conditions, such as, cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to measure body composition, but the easiest method to assess body composition is the use of anthropometric indices. This study has been designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of body composition prediction equations by various anthropometric measures instead of a whole body DXA scan. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified 143 adult patients underwent DXA evaluation of the whole body. The anthropometric indices were also measured. Datasets were split randomly into two parts. Multiple regression analysis with a backward stepwise elimination procedure was used as the derivation set and then the estimates were compared with the actual measurements from the whole-body scans for a validation set. The SPSS version 20 for Windows software was used in multiple regression and data analysis.

resultsUsing multiple linear regression analyses, the best equation for predicting the whole-body fat mass (R(2) = 0.808) included the body mass index (BMI) and gender; the best equation for predicting whole-body lean mass (R(2) = 0.780) included BMI, WC, gender, and age; and the best equation for predicting trunk fat mass (R(2) = 0.759) included BMI, WC, and gender.

conclusionsCombinations of anthropometric measurements predict whole-body lean mass and trunk fat mass better than any of these single anthropometric indices. Therefore, the findings of the present study may be used to verify the results in patients with various diseases or diets.

Indexed as

Anthropometrybody compositiondual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Identifiers

PMID25709999
PMCPMC4333433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.