ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2015
Anthropometric predictive equations for estimating body composition.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of Prediction Equations of Lean Body Mass Suitable for Chinese Adults.BioMed research international · 2019Trial
- Beyond Group Averages: Rethinking Body Composition Assessment in the Era of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Perspective from Korea.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Validation of Predictive Equations for Estimating Lean Soft Tissue and Fat-Free Mass in Class II-V Obesity: A Multicenter Observational Study with Implications for Bariatric Surgery Monitoring.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2026Observational
- Accuracy of Body Composition Prediction Equations in Middle-Aged Females with Class II and III Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Neural Network Models for Accurate Predictions of Fat-Free and Fat Masses, Using Easy-to-Measure Anthropometric Parameters.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Probabilistic prediction of segmental body composition in Iranian children and adolescents.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Correlation between percentage of fat mass and level of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of maternal central adiposity on infant anthropometry and perinatal morbidity: A systematic review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2020Review
- Anthropometric Indices and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor in Predicting Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - A Prospective Study in Indian Population.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise and accurate measurements of body composition are useful in achieving a greater understanding of human energy metabolism in physiology and in different clinical conditions, such as, cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to measure body composition, but the easiest method to assess body composition is the use of anthropometric indices. This study has been designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of body composition prediction equations by various anthropometric measures instead of a whole body DXA scan. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe identified 143 adult patients underwent DXA evaluation of the whole body. The anthropometric indices were also measured. Datasets were split randomly into two parts. Multiple regression analysis with a backward stepwise elimination procedure was used as the derivation set and then the estimates were compared with the actual measurements from the whole-body scans for a validation set. The SPSS version 20 for Windows software was used in multiple regression and data analysis.
resultsUsing multiple linear regression analyses, the best equation for predicting the whole-body fat mass (R(2) = 0.808) included the body mass index (BMI) and gender; the best equation for predicting whole-body lean mass (R(2) = 0.780) included BMI, WC, gender, and age; and the best equation for predicting trunk fat mass (R(2) = 0.759) included BMI, WC, and gender.
conclusionsCombinations of anthropometric measurements predict whole-body lean mass and trunk fat mass better than any of these single anthropometric indices. Therefore, the findings of the present study may be used to verify the results in patients with various diseases or diets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.