Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25709831›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2014

On the duality between interaction responses and mutual positions in flocking and schooling.

Andrea Perna, Guillaume Grégoire, Richard P Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Weber's Law-based perception and the stability of animal groups.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  5. Collective decision making by rational individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Using activity and sociability to characterize collective motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  7. From single steps to mass migration: the problem of scale in the movement ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement.The Journal of experimental biology · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea PernaParis Interdisciplinary Energy Research Institute, Paris Diderot University, 10 rue Alice Domon et Léonie Duquet, Paris, 75013 France.
Guillaume GrégoireLaboratoire Matiere Systemes Complexes, Paris Diderot University, 10 rue Alice Domon et Léonie Duquet, Paris, 75013 France.
Richard P MannMathematics Department, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala, 75754 Sweden ; Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulations, ETH Zürich, Clausiusstrasse 50, Zürich, 8092 Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research in animal behaviour has contributed to determine how alignment, turning responses, and changes of speed mediate flocking and schooling interactions in different animal species. Here, we propose a complementary approach to the analysis of flocking phenomena, based on the idea that animals occupy preferential, anysotropic positions with respect to their neighbours, and devote a large amount of their interaction responses to maintaining their mutual positions. We test our approach by deriving the apparent alignment and attraction responses from simulated trajectories of animals moving side by side, or one in front of the other. We show that the anisotropic positioning of individuals, in combination with noise, is sufficient to reproduce several aspects of the movement responses observed in real animal groups. This anisotropy at the level of interactions should be considered explicitly in future models of flocking and schooling. By making a distinction between interaction responses involved in maintaining a preferred flock configuration, and interaction responses directed at changing it, our work provides a frame to discriminate movement interactions that signal directional conflict from interactions underlying consensual group motion.

Indexed as

Collective motionFlockingMovement analysisSchooling

Identifiers

PMID25709831
PMCPMC4337765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.