Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25709761›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2015

What can we learn from molecular dynamics simulations for GPCR drug design?

Christofer S Tautermann, Daniel Seeliger, Jan M Kriegl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Investigating the electrostatics underlying activation of the βBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of a β-arrestin-biased negative allosteric modulator for the βProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Constituents of buriti oil (Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Route to Prolonged Residence Time at the Histamine HJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Better agonist for the opioid receptors.Chemistry Central journal · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christofer S TautermannBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Lead Identification and Optimization Support, Birkendorfer Str. 65, D-88397 Biberach a.d. Riss, Germany.
Daniel SeeligerBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Lead Identification and Optimization Support, Birkendorfer Str. 65, D-88397 Biberach a.d. Riss, Germany.
Jan M KrieglBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Lead Identification and Optimization Support, Birkendorfer Str. 65, D-88397 Biberach a.d. Riss, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen a tremendous progress in the elucidation of experimental structural information for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although for the vast majority of pharmaceutically relevant GPCRs structural information is still accessible only by homology models the steadily increasing amount of structural information fosters the application of structure-based drug design tools for this important class of drug targets. In this article we focus on the application of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in GPCR drug discovery programs. Typical application scenarios of MD simulations and their scope and limitations will be described on the basis of two selected case studies, namely the binding of small molecule antagonists to the human CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) and a detailed investigation of the interplay between receptor dynamics and solvation for the binding of small molecules to the human muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 3 (hM3R).

Indexed as

CC chemokine receptor 3GPCRHomology modelingMolecular dynamics simulationsMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor 3Water network

Identifiers

PMID25709761
PMCPMC4334948
OpenAlexW2017128003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.