ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2015
Multimodality therapy is recommended for limited-stage combined small cell esophageal carcinoma.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment strategies for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: comparative analysis of multimodal regimens in two independent real-world cohorts.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Survival analysis of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a 15-year retrospective study from a high-incidence region.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Primary Esophageal Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Case Report With a Review of Presentation, Treatment, and Survival.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Nomogram for the prediction of individualized overall survival of patients diagnosed with small cell esophageal carcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Use of Chemoradiotherapy as a Treatment Option for Patients with Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Primary small cell oesophageal carcinoma: A retrospective study of different treatment modalities.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: progression in the last decade.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- CD155 Overexpression Correlates With Poor Prognosis in Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Nationwide Analysis of Treatment and Outcome at Patient Level in Locoregional Disease.American journal of clinical oncology · 2019Article
- A retrospective study on the prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with primary small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
- Survival benefit of radiotherapy to patients with small cell esophagus carcinoma: an analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- A Rare Case of Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
- A Retrospective Study of 52 Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Treated With Radical Surgery.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy in Patients With Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A SEER Database Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimLimited-stage combined small cell esophageal carcinoma (LS-C-SCEC) is a rare, poorly understood, underdiagnosed disease, with components of both small cell esophageal cancer and non-small cell esophageal cancer. We investigated the optimal treatment strategy and prognostic factors in patients with LS-C-SCEC. PATIENTS AND
methodsLS-C-SCEC patients included in the analysis (from our hospital and the literature) were treated between January 1966 and December 2013. Patient treatment strategies included surgery (S), chemotherapy (CT), and radiation therapy (RT). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end points included tumor complete response rates, patterns of failure, and toxicity. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine prognosticators for OS.
resultsA total of 72 patients were included in the analysis: 24 (33%) from our hospital and 48 (67%) from the literature. The median OS of all patients was 15.0 months. Patients who received CT had a significantly longer median OS than did those who did not (OS 22.8 months vs 10.0 months) (P=0.03). Patients treated with multimodality therapy (including RT+CT [18%], S+CT [40%], or S+RT+CT [17%]) vs monotherapy (typically, S [18%]) had significantly improved OS (15.5 months vs 9.3 months) (P=0.02) and complete response rates. On multivariate analysis, tumor location (upper third of the esophagus) and type of treatment (monotherapy) were the only factors predictive of poor OS.
conclusionMultimodality therapy (including RT+CT, S+CT, or S+RT+CT) improves OS for patients with LS-C-SCEC compared with monotherapy (typically, S). Additional studies are necessary to personalize multimodal treatment approaches to individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.