ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2015
PSCA rs2294008 C > T polymorphism contributes to gastric and bladder cancer risk.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- An association study on PSCA rs2294008 polymorphism and gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk: a comprehensive review synopsis from meta-analysis and genome-wide association studies.Cancer biology & medicine · 2019Article
- Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Association between PSCA gene polymorphisms and the risk of cancer: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in PSCA and the risk of breast cancer in a Chinese population.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Article
- Prostate stem cell antigen variation rs2294008 associated with the risk of bladder cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies suggested genetic variations in PSCA (prostate stem cell antigen) may confer the susceptibility of cancer. Many case-control studies have reported the relationship between PSCA rs2294008 C > T polymorphism and cancer, especially gastric cancer and bladder cancer. However, the results are inconsistent. This meta-analysis is aimed at evaluating the association of rs2294008 polymorphism with cancer risk.
methodsThe databases of PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for related publications. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the strength of the associations. Fixed models were used when heterogeneity among studies was not detected, otherwise the random model was used.
resultsTwenty-six studies from 24 articles with 30,050 multiple cancer cases and 51,670 controls were pooled into this meta-analysis. The results showed that the rs2294008 polymorphism was associated with increased cancer risk in any genetic model (T vs C, OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.28; TT vs CC, OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14-1.62; TC vs CC, OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.17-1.44; TT + TC vs CC, OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.18-1.49; TT vs TC + CC, OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02-1.30). In stratified analysis by cancer type, we found that the T allele had a significant high risk of gastric and bladder cancer, but not in other cancers. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, increased cancer risk was found in both Asians and Caucasians.
conclusionOur study suggested that the PSCA rs2294008 C > T polymorphism is a risk factor for cancer, especially in gastric and bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.