Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25709432›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

A living thick nanofibrous implant bifunctionalized with active growth factor and stem cells for bone regeneration.

Sandy Eap, Laetitia Keller, Jessica Schiavi, Olivier Huck, Leandro Jacomine, Florence Fioretti, Christian Gauthier, Victor Sebastian, Pascale Schwinté, Nadia Benkirane-Jessel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nanomaterials and Their Impact on the Immune System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Temporomandibular Joint Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandy EapINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Laetitia KellerINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ; Department of Chemical Engineering, Aragon Nanoscience Institute, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jessica SchiaviINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier HuckINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Leandro JacomineCNRS (National Center for Scientific Research), ICS (Charles Sadron Institute), Strasbourg, France.
Florence FiorettiINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Christian GauthierCNRS (National Center for Scientific Research), ICS (Charles Sadron Institute), Strasbourg, France.
Victor SebastianINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Department of Chemical Engineering, Aragon Nanoscience Institute, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ; Networking Research Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pascale SchwintéINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Nadia Benkirane-JesselINSERM, UMR 1109, Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine Laboratory, FMTS, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France ; Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Regenerative NanoMedicine · FRInstitut Charles Sadron · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New-generation implants focus on robust, durable, and rapid tissue regeneration to shorten recovery times and decrease risks of postoperative complications for patients. Herein, we describe a new-generation thick nanofibrous implant functionalized with active containers of growth factors and stem cells for regenerative nanomedicine. A thick electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous implant (from 700 μm to 1 cm thick) was functionalized with chitosan and bone morphogenetic protein BMP-7 as growth factor using layer-by-layer technology, producing fish scale-like chitosan/BMP-7 nanoreservoirs. This extracellular matrix-mimicking scaffold enabled in vitro colonization and bone regeneration by human primary osteoblasts, as shown by expression of osteocalcin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein (BSPII), 21 days after seeding. In vivo implantation in mouse calvaria defects showed significantly more newly mineralized extracellular matrix in the functionalized implant compared to a bare scaffold after 30 days' implantation, as shown by histological scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray microscopy study and calcein injection. We have as well bifunctionalized our BMP-7 therapeutic implant by adding human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). The activity of this BMP-7-functionalized implant was again further enhanced by the addition of hMSCs to the implant (living materials), in vivo, as demonstrated by the analysis of new bone formation and calcification after 30 days' implantation in mice with calvaria defects. Therefore, implants functionalized with BMP-7 nanocontainers associated with hMSCs can act as an accelerator of in vivo bone mineralization and regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone SubstitutesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsBone RegenerationChitosanHumansMiceNanofibersProstheses and ImplantsSkullBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone SubstitutesChitosanBMP-7electrospun nanofibers implantnanocontainers of growth factorsregenerative nanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID25709432
PMCPMC4327569
OpenAlexW2053538443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.