Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25709034›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2015

Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations for fragment-based drug design.

Christina E Faller, E Prabhu Raman, Alexander D MacKerell, Olgun Guvench

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CosolvKit: a Versatile Tool for Cosolvent MD Preparation and Analysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Directional ΔJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. FASTDock: A Pipeline for Allosteric Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Computer-Aided Drug Design: An Update.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina E FallerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of New England, 716 Stevens Avenue, Portland, ME, 04103, USA.
E Prabhu Raman
Alexander D MacKerell
Olgun Guvench
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of New England · US

Funding

Restoration of Tumor Suppression Activity in Malignant MelanomaR01CA107331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEBER, DAVID JOSEPH · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
Discovery of Novel Macrolide AntibioticsR01AI080968 · NIAID · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ANDRADE, RODRIGO B · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Molecular Mechanism of Flexible Carbohydrate-Protein Interaction in CD44R15GM099022 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI GUVENCH, OLGUN · 2011 to 2011
$352k
NCI NIH HHS CA107331NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107331NIAID NIH HHS AI080968NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080968NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM099022NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM099022NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD003866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragment-based drug design (FBDD) involves screening low molecular weight molecules ("fragments") that correspond to functional groups found in larger drug-like molecules to determine their binding to target proteins or nucleic acids. Based on the principle of thermodynamic additivity, two fragments that bind nonoverlapping nearby sites on the target can be combined to yield a new molecule whose binding free energy is the sum of those of the fragments. Experimental FBDD approaches, like NMR and X-ray crystallography, have proven very useful but can be expensive in terms of time, materials, and labor. Accordingly, a variety of computational FBDD approaches have been developed that provide different levels of detail and accuracy.The Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) method of computational FBDD uses all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify fragment binding. The target is "soaked" in an aqueous solution with multiple fragments having different identities. The resulting computational competition assay reveals what small molecule types are most likely to bind which regions of the target. From SILCS simulations, 3D probability maps of fragment binding called "FragMaps" can be produced. Based on the probabilities relative to bulk, SILCS FragMaps can be used to determine "Grid Free Energies (GFEs)," which provide per-atom contributions to fragment binding affinities. For essentially no additional computational overhead relative to the production of the FragMaps, GFEs can be used to compute Ligand Grid Free Energies (LGFEs) for arbitrarily complex molecules, and these LGFEs can be used to rank-order the molecules in accordance with binding affinities.

Indexed as

Drug DesignLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesThermodynamicsLigandsProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID25709034
PMCPMC4685950
OpenAlexW2410463796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.