ArticleBMC genomics2015
Genome-wide association data classification and SNPs selection using two-stage quality-based Random Forests.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning on a Genome-wide Association Study to Predict Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018Trial
- Integrating multi-layer perceptron and random forest in an ensemble framework for improved genomic prediction accuracy and SHAP-derived interpretability of residual feed intake in cattle.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Modeling Chickpea Productivity with Artificial Image Objects and Convolutional Neural Network.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Raman spectroscopy for postmortem interval estimation of human skeletal remains: A scoping review.Journal of biophotonics · 2023Article
- Genome-wide association study as a powerful tool for dissecting competitive traits in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Modeling of Flowering Time inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A machine learning-based SNP-set analysis approach for identifying disease-associated susceptibility loci.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Deciphering Pleiotropic Signatures of Regulatory SNPs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Integration of Imaging Genomics Data for the Study of Alzheimer's Disease Using Joint-Connectivity-Based Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2022Article
- A Secure High-Order Gene Interaction Detecting Method for Infectious Diseases.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Identifying Functions of Proteins in Mice With Functional Embedding Features.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic Polymorphisms in Pharmaceuticals and Chemotherapy.World journal of oncology · 2021Review
- Addressing Measurement Error in Random Forests Using Quantitative Bias Analysis.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Careful feature selection is key in classification of Alzheimer's disease patients based on whole-genome sequencing data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- iMPT-FDNPL: Identification of Membrane Protein Types with Functional Domains and a Natural Language Processing Approach.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Genetic Study of Alzheimer's Disease.Aging and disease · 2020Review
- Article
- Genomics models in radiotherapy: From mechanistic to machine learning.Medical physics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selection and identification are the most important tasks in Genome-wide association data analysis. The problem is difficult because genome-wide association data is very high dimensional and a large portion of SNPs in the data is irrelevant to the disease. Advanced machine learning methods have been successfully used in Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for identification of genetic variants that have relatively big effects in some common, complex diseases. Among them, the most successful one is Random Forests (RF). Despite of performing well in terms of prediction accuracy in some data sets with moderate size, RF still suffers from working in GWAS for selecting informative SNPs and building accurate prediction models. In this paper, we propose to use a new two-stage quality-based sampling method in random forests, named ts-RF, for SNP subspace selection for GWAS. The method first applies p-value assessment to find a cut-off point that separates informative and irrelevant SNPs in two groups. The informative SNPs group is further divided into two sub-groups: highly informative and weak informative SNPs. When sampling the SNP subspace for building trees for the forest, only those SNPs from the two sub-groups are taken into account. The feature subspaces always contain highly informative SNPs when used to split a node at a tree.
resultsThis approach enables one to generate more accurate trees with a lower prediction error, meanwhile possibly avoiding overfitting. It allows one to detect interactions of multiple SNPs with the diseases, and to reduce the dimensionality and the amount of Genome-wide association data needed for learning the RF model. Extensive experiments on two genome-wide SNP data sets (Parkinson case-control data comprised of 408,803 SNPs and Alzheimer case-control data comprised of 380,157 SNPs) and 10 gene data sets have demonstrated that the proposed model significantly reduced prediction errors and outperformed most existing the-state-of-the-art random forests. The top 25 SNPs in Parkinson data set were identified by the proposed model including four interesting genes associated with neurological disorders.
conclusionThe presented approach has shown to be effective in selecting informative sub-groups of SNPs potentially associated with diseases that traditional statistical approaches might fail. The new RF works well for the data where the number of case-control objects is much smaller than the number of SNPs, which is a typical problem in gene data and GWAS. Experiment results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed RF model that outperformed the state-of-the-art RFs, including Breiman's RF, GRRF and wsRF methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.