ReviewClinical drug investigation2015
The diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia with α-blockers: focus on silodosin.
Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel spectrophotometric approaches for analysis of solifenacin and silodosin in pharmaceutical preparations, human plasma, and environmental water samples: assessment of the methods' greenness and practicality.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Drug-Related Orthostatic Hypotension: Beyond Anti-Hypertensive Medications.Drugs & aging · 2020Review
- Latest developments in the assessment and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: what is clinically relevant?Clinical drug investigation · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower urinary tract symp toms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) are common in aging men and can progress to acute urinary retention. Among the classes of agents recommended for patients with moderate to severe symptoms are α-adrenergic receptor (adrenoceptor) antagonists (α-blockers) and 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). This review provides a brief overview of the diagnosis and management of LUTS/BPH, focusing on the efficacy and tolerability of α-blockers approved for the treatment of LUTS/BPH, with particular emphasis on silodosin, a novel α-blocker. Of the older α1-blockers, alfuzosin, doxazosin and terazosin show little selectivity for the α1-adrenoceptor subtypes, while tamsulosin is moderately and silodosin is highly selective for the α1A subtype in preference to the α1B subtype. Highly selective α1A-receptor antagonists such as silodosin were developed specifically for the treatment of LUTS because non-selective antagonists were associated with cardiovascular adverse effects. Since α1A is predominantly expressed in the prostate, higher selectivity for α1A may account for lower blood pressure-related adverse effects. Silodosin is administered once daily and provides rapid improvements in the signs and symptoms of moderate to severe LUTS/BPH in male patients. As with other α-blockers, silodosin is generally well-tolerated and the most common adverse events seen are abnormal ejaculation, dizziness, headache, diarrhoea, nasal congestion and orthostatic hypotension. Unlike 5ARIs, α-blockers do not impair libido. Given the prevalence of LUTS/BPH and the efficacy and tolerability concerns with existing therapies, silodosin is a welcome addition to the pharmacological options for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.