Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25708419›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2015

Probiotic prophylaxis to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in children on mechanical ventilation: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

Balasubramaniam Banupriya, Niranjan Biswal, Rangan Srinivasaraghavan, Parameswaran Narayanan, Jharna Mandal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  16. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Balasubramaniam BanupriyaDepartment of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Niranjan Biswal
Rangan Srinivasaraghavan
Parameswaran Narayanan
Jharna Mandal
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVentilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common nosocomial infections in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). It is associated with increased mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Several preventive strategies have been introduced to reduce VAP. One novel intervention is prophylactic administration of probiotics. Studies on the effect of probiotics on VAP in pediatric populations are lacking.

methodsThis was an open-label randomized controlled trial. A total of 150 children no older than 12 years admitted to the PICU were recruited from November 2011 to July 2013. Children who were likely to require ventilation for more than 48 h were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups after stratification based on age groups. Children in the intervention group received probiotic preparation twice a day beginning from the day of ICU admission till 7 days or discharge from ICU, whichever was earlier. The control group did not receive any placebo. Children were examined daily for evidence of VAP and were followed up till discharge from hospital. Incidence of VAP, duration of hospital stay, and mortality were compared.

resultsChildren who received prophylactic probiotics had a lower incidence of VAP compared to the control group (17.1 % in the probiotics group vs 48.6 % in the control group, p < 0.001; 22 per 1,000 ventilated days vs 39 per 1,000 ventilated days, p = 0.02). On multiple logistic regression analysis, use of prophylactic probiotics decreased the incidence of VAP by 77 % and reduced the duration of ICU and hospital stays by an average of 2.1 and 3.3 days, respectively, after adjusting for the other confounders. No complications due to administration of probiotics were observed in the study.

conclusionProphylactic probiotics administration resulted in reduction of the incidence of VAP in critically ill children in a setting where baseline VAP rates are high. The intervention was found to be safe.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricLength of StayMalePneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedProbioticsRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID25708419
OpenAlexW2053114274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.