Trial reportCancer science2015
Prediction of desmoid tumor progression using miRNA expression profiling.
Trial report in Cancer science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraabdominal sporadic desmoid tumors and inflammation: an updated literature review and presentation and insights on pathogenesis of synchronous sporadic mesenteric desmoid tumors occurring after surgery for necrotizing pancreatitis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- The Role of Pharmacotherapeutic Agents in Children with Desmoid Tumors.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- Serum exosomal microRNA-766-3p expression is associated with poor prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer science · 2020Article
- Article
- Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis: Who, When, and How to Treat.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017Review
- Familial adenomatous patients with desmoid tumours show increased expression of miR-34a in serum and high levels in tumours.Oncoscience · 2016Article
- Current Update on Desmoid Fibromatosis.Journal of computer assisted tomographyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Desmoid tumor is a rare connective tissue tumor with locoregional aggressiveness but unpredictable behavior. The miRNA profile was ascertained for 26 patients included in the Desminib phase II trial and an independent validation cohort of 15 patients. Predictive and prognostic supervised analysis on the Desminib cohort failed to identify miRNAs differentially expressed between progressive and non-progressive patients under imatinib treatment or between progressive and non-progressive patients after discontinuation of imatinib. However, an unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the Desminib cohort identified two groups (A and B) of 13 patients each, where only the number of previous lines of treatment before inclusion in the study differed significantly between the two groups. Time to progression after discontinuation of imatinib was longer in group B than in group A. Fifteen miRNAs were highly statistically differentially expressed between groups A and B, targeting more than 3000 genes, including AGO1, BCL2, CDK6, SMAD4, PTEN, CCND1, VEGFA, and RB1. These results were confirmed in the independent validation cohort: hierarchical clustering of these 15 miRNAs identified two groups, in which time to recurrence was statistically different (28.8 months vs 68.8 months). These results provide the first indication of the prognostic value of miRNA expression profiling with a possible direct impact on patient management. A more precise miRNA signature must now be determined to select patients who would not benefit from surgical resection of their tumor and who ought to be monitored without treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.