Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25707026›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2015

Background ionizing radiation and the risk of childhood cancer: a census-based nationwide cohort study.

Ben D Spycher, Judith E Lupatsch, Marcel Zwahlen, Martin Röösli, Felix Niggli, Michael A Grotzer, Johannes Rischewski, Matthias Egger, Claudia E Kuehni, Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
32.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ben D SpycherInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Judith E Lupatsch
Marcel Zwahlen
Martin Röösli
Felix Niggli
Michael A Grotzer
Johannes Rischewski
Matthias Egger
Claudia E Kuehni
Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group
Swiss National Cohort Study Group
University of Bern · CHSandia National Laboratories · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to medium or high doses of ionizing radiation is a known risk factor for cancer in children. The extent to which low-dose radiation from natural sources contributes to the risk of childhood cancer remains unclear.

objectivesIn a nationwide census-based cohort study, we investigated whether the incidence of childhood cancer was associated with background radiation from terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays.

methodsChildren < 16 years of age in the Swiss National Censuses in 1990 and 2000 were included. The follow-up period lasted until 2008, and incident cancer cases were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A radiation model was used to predict dose rates from terrestrial and cosmic radiation at locations of residence. Cox regression models were used to assess associations between cancer risk and dose rates and cumulative dose since birth.

resultsAmong 2,093,660 children included at census, 1,782 incident cases of cancer were identified including 530 with leukemia, 328 with lymphoma, and 423 with a tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). Hazard ratios for each millisievert increase in cumulative dose of external radiation were 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05) for any cancer, 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) for leukemia, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.05) for lymphoma, and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) for CNS tumors. Adjustment for a range of potential confounders had little effect on the results.

conclusionsOur study suggests that background radiation may contribute to the risk of cancer in children, including leukemia and CNS tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentBackground RadiationCensusesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation ExposureRisk AssessmentSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID25707026
PMCPMC4455589
OpenAlexW1990575193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.