Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25706553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of physical performance measures in acutely admitted older medical patients.

Ann Christine Bodilsen, Helle Gybel Juul-Larsen, Janne Petersen, Nina Beyer, Ove Andersen, Thomas Bandholm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Reliability of graded cycling test with talk test and 30-s chair-stand test in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Christine BodilsenOptimized Senior Patient Program, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen; Department of Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Helle Gybel Juul-LarsenOptimized Senior Patient Program, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Janne PetersenOptimized Senior Patient Program, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Nina BeyerMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Department of Physical Therapy & Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ove AndersenOptimized Senior Patient Program, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas BandholmOptimized Senior Patient Program, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen; Department of Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePhysical performance measures can be used to predict functional decline and increased dependency in older persons. However, few studies have assessed the feasibility or reliability of such measures in hospitalized older patients. Here we assessed the feasibility and inter-rater reliability of four simple measures of physical performance in acutely admitted older medical patients.

designDuring the first 24 hours of hospitalization, the following were assessed twice by different raters in 52 (≥ 65 years) patients admitted for acute medical illness: isometric hand grip strength, 4-meter gait speed, 30-s chair stand and Cumulated Ambulation Score. Relative reliability was expressed as weighted kappa for the Cumulated Ambulation Score or as intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC1,1) and lower limit of the 95%-confidence interval (LL95%) for grip strength, gait speed, and 30-s chair stand. Absolute reliability was expressed as the standard error of measurement and the smallest real difference as a percentage of their respective means (SEM% and SRD%).

resultsThe primary reasons for admission of the 52 included patients were infectious disease and cardiovascular illness. The mean± SD age was 78±8.3 years, and 73.1% were women. All patients performed grip strength and Cumulated Ambulation Score testing, 81% performed the gait speed test, and 54% completed the 30-s chair stand test (46% were unable to rise without using the armrests). No systematic bias was found between first and second tests or between raters. The weighted kappa for the Cumulated Ambulation Score was 0.76 (0.60-0.92). The ICC1,1 values were as follows: grip strength, 0.95 (LL95% 0.92); gait speed, 0.92 (LL95% 0.73), and 30-s chair stand, 0.82 (LL95% 0.67). The SEM% values for grip strength, gait speed, and 30-s chair stand were 8%, 7%, and 18%, and the SRD95% values were 22%, 17%, and 49%.

conclusionIn acutely admitted older medical patients, grip strength, gait speed, and the Cumulated Ambulation Score measurements were feasible and showed high inter-rater reliability when administered by different raters. The feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the 30-s chair stand were moderate, complicating the use of the 30-s chair stand in acutely admitted older medical patients. However, the predefined modified version of the chair stand test was both feasible and with high inter-rater reliability in this population.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAgedFemaleGaitHand StrengthHospitalizationHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsWalking

Identifiers

PMID25706553
PMCPMC4338133
OpenAlexW2131638850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.