Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25706524›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

High-throughput biochemical fingerprinting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Achim Kohler, Ulrike Böcker, Volha Shapaval, Annabelle Forsmark, Mats Andersson, Jonas Warringer, Harald Martens, Stig W Omholt, Anders Blomberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Achim KohlerCIGENE, Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway; Nofima AS, Ås, Norway.
Ulrike BöckerNofima AS, Ås, Norway.
Volha ShapavalNofima AS, Ås, Norway; CIGENE, Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Annabelle ForsmarkDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; CIGENE, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Mats AnderssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonas WarringerDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; CIGENE, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Harald MartensNofima AS, Ås, Norway; CIGENE, Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Stig W OmholtCIGENE, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Anders BlombergDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nofima · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Gothenburg · SEFafo Foundation · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-channel optical density measurements of population growth are the dominant large scale phenotyping methodology for bridging the gene-function gap in yeast. However, a substantial amount of the genetic variation induced by single allele, single gene or double gene knock-out technologies fail to manifest in detectable growth phenotypes under conditions readily testable in the laboratory. Thus, new high-throughput phenotyping technologies capable of providing information about molecular level consequences of genetic variation are sorely needed. Here we report a protocol for high-throughput Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measuring biochemical fingerprints of yeast strains. It includes high-throughput cultivation for FTIR spectroscopy, FTIR measurements and spectral pre-treatment to increase measurement accuracy. We demonstrate its capacity to distinguish not only yeast genera, species and populations, but also strains that differ only by a single gene, its excellent signal-to-noise ratio and its relative robustness to measurement bias. Finally, we illustrated its applicability by determining the FTIR signatures of all viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae single gene knock-outs corresponding to lipid biosynthesis genes. Many of the examined knock-out strains showed distinct, highly reproducible FTIR phenotypes despite having no detectable growth phenotype. These phenotypes were confirmed by conventional lipid analysis and could be linked to specific changes in lipid composition. We conclude that the introduced protocol is robust to noise and bias, possible to apply on a very large scale, and capable of generating biologically meaningful biochemical fingerprints that are strain specific, even when strains lack detectable growth phenotypes. Thus, it has a substantial potential for application in the molecular functionalization of the yeast genome.

Indexed as

AllelesGenes, FungalGenetic VariationGenome, FungalLipidsPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal-To-Noise RatioSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredLipids

Identifiers

PMID25706524
PMCPMC4338198
OpenAlexW2136636645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.