Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25706477›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2015

Recommendations from the workshop on Comparative Approaches to Safety Assessment of GM Plant Materials: A road toward harmonized criteria?

Andrew Bartholomaeus, Juan Carlos Batista, Moisés Burachik, Wayne Parrott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew Bartholomaeusa School of Pharmacy; University of Canberra; Canberra, Australia & Therapeutic Research Centre; School of Medicine; University of Queensland ; Brisbane , Queensland , Australia.
Juan Carlos Batista
Moisés Burachik
Wayne Parrott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An international meeting of genetically modified (GM) food safety assessors from the main importing and exporting countries from Asia and the Americas was held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, between June 26(th) and 28(th), 2013. Participants shared their evaluation approaches, identified similarities and challenges, and used their experience to propose areas for future work. Recommendations for improving risk assessment procedures and avenues for future collaboration were also discussed. The deliberations of the meeting were also supported by a survey of participants which canvassed risk assessment approaches across the regions from which participants came. This project was initiated by Argentine Agri-Food Health and Quality National Service (SENASA, Ministry of Agriculture, Argentina), with the support of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and other partner institutions. The importance of making all possible efforts toward more integrated and harmonized regulatory oversight for GM organisms (GMOs) was strongly emphasized. This exercise showed that such harmonization is a feasible goal that would contribute to sustain a fluid trade of commodities and ultimately enhance food security. Before this can be achieved, key issues identified in this meeting will have to be addressed in the near future to enable regulatory collaboration or joint work. The authors propose that the recommendations coming out of the meeting should be used as a basis for continuing work, follow up discussions and concrete actions.

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedArgentinaBiotechnologyCongresses as TopicConsumer Product SafetyCrops, AgriculturalGuidelines as TopicRisk Assessmentbiotechnologycompositional analysisfood safetygenetically modified organismsGLP, good laboratory practicesGM, genetically modifiedGMOs, genetically modified organismsHESI, ILSI's Health and Environmental Sciences InstituteIFBiC, ILSI's International Food Biotechnology CommitteeILSI, International Life Sciences InstituteOECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmentprotein safetyregulatory harmonizationrisk assessmentSENASA, Agri-Food Health and Quality National Service (Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria of Argentina)stacked traitstransgenic cropswhole food testing

Identifiers

PMID25706477
PMCPMC5033214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.