Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25706473›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2015

The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Joseph M Galea, Elizabeth Mallia, John Rothwell, Jörn Diedrichsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dopamine D2 Receptor Modulates Exercise Related Effect on Cortical Excitation/Inhibition and Motor Skill Acquisition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Motor cortex inhibition by TMS reduces cognitive non-motor procedural learning when immediate incentives are present.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2017
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph M GaleaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth MalliaSobell Department for Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
John RothwellSobell Department for Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000000313676467
Jörn DiedrichsenInsititute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000000302648532

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common assumption regarding error-based motor learning (motor adaptation) in humans is that its underlying mechanism is automatic and insensitive to reward- or punishment-based feedback. Contrary to this hypothesis, we show in a double dissociation that the two have independent effects on the learning and retention components of motor adaptation. Negative feedback, whether graded or binary, accelerated learning. While it was not necessary for the negative feedback to be coupled to monetary loss, it had to be clearly related to the actual performance on the preceding movement. Positive feedback did not speed up learning, but it increased retention of the motor memory when performance feedback was withdrawn. These findings reinforce the view that independent mechanisms underpin learning and retention in motor adaptation, reject the assumption that motor adaptation is independent of motivational feedback, and raise new questions regarding the neural basis of negative and positive motivational feedback in motor learning.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotivationMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformancePunishmentRetention, PsychologyRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25706473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.