Cardiogenic shock induced reduction in cellular O2 delivery as a hallmark of acute H2S intoxication.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Methylene Blue Administration During and After Life-Threatening Intoxication by Hydrogen Sulfide: Efficacy Studies in Adult Sheep and Mechanisms of Action.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
   Article
2. H2S concentrations in the heart after acute H2S administration: methodological and physiological considerations.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2016
   Article
3. Developing effective countermeasures against acute hydrogen sulfide intoxication: challenges and limitations.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as