Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25706301›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sugarcane giant borer transcriptome analysis and identification of genes related to digestion.

Fernando Campos de Assis Fonseca, Alexandre Augusto Pereira Firmino, Leonardo Lima Pepino de Macedo, Roberta Ramos Coelho, José Dijair Antonino de Souza Júnior, José Dijair Antonino de Sousa Júnior, Orzenil Bonfim Silva-Junior, Roberto Coiti Togawa, Georgios Joannis Pappas, Luiz Avelar Brandão de Góis and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando Campos de Assis FonsecaEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Alexandre Augusto Pereira FirminoEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Leonardo Lima Pepino de MacedoEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Roberta Ramos CoelhoEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
José Dijair Antonino de Souza Júnior
José Dijair Antonino de Sousa JúniorEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Orzenil Bonfim Silva-JuniorEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Roberto Coiti TogawaEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Georgios Joannis PappasUniversidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Luiz Avelar Brandão de GóisUsina triunfo, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Maria Cristina Mattar da SilvaEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Maria Fátima Grossi-de-SáEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane is a widely cultivated plant that serves primarily as a source of sugar and ethanol. Its annual yield can be significantly reduced by the action of several insect pests including the sugarcane giant borer (Telchin licus licus), a lepidopteran that presents a long life cycle and which efforts to control it using pesticides have been inefficient. Although its economical relevance, only a few DNA sequences are available for this species in the GenBank. Pyrosequencing technology was used to investigate the transcriptome of several developmental stages of the insect. To maximize transcript diversity, a pool of total RNA was extracted from whole body insects and used to construct a normalized cDNA database. Sequencing produced over 650,000 reads, which were de novo assembled to generate a reference library of 23,824 contigs. After quality score and annotation, 43% of the contigs had at least one BLAST hit against the NCBI non-redundant database, and 40% showed similarities with the lepidopteran Bombyx mori. In a further analysis, we conducted a comparison with Manduca sexta midgut sequences to identify transcripts of genes involved in digestion. Of these transcripts, many presented an expansion or depletion in gene number, compared to B. mori genome. From the sugarcane giant borer (SGB) transcriptome, a number of aminopeptidase N (APN) cDNAs were characterized based on homology to those reported as Cry toxin receptors. This is the first report that provides a large-scale EST database for the species. Transcriptome analysis will certainly be useful to identify novel developmental genes, to better understand the insect's biology and to guide the development of new strategies for insect-pest control.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCD13 AntigensDigestionExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryGene OntologyInsect ProteinsLepidopteraLife Cycle StagesMolecular Sequence DataReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSaccharumSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Amino AcidCD13 AntigensInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25706301
PMCPMC4338194
OpenAlexW2094700473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.