ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
302 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A multi-omic meta-analysis reveals novel mechanisms of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors.Communications biology · 2025Pooled it
- A cosmopolitan inversion facilitates seasonal adaptation in overwintering Drosophila.Genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.Genetics · 2026Article
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Haplotype and diversity signatures of ultra-soft selective sweeps in HIV-1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis identifies loci associated with pyrethroid resistance across sister species in the Anopheles gambiae species complex.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Complex adaptive architectures constrain the pace of adaptations sweeping across human gut microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Deep Genomic Differentiation and Highly Differentiated Segments Between a Composite Domestic Cattle Population and Yak from the Ili River Valley and Other Xinjiang Regions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Fast pairwise coalescence enables gene-resolution scans for recent selection in diverse human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Haplotype-Based Models Improve Sweep Detection in Ancient Populations with Complex Demography.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Manual validation finds ultra-long-read sequencing best enables faithful, population-level structural variant calling in Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin with nanopore.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Soft Selective Sweeps Predominate in the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic Signatures of Microgeographic Adaptation in Anopheles coluzzii Across Urban, Rural, and Forested Environments in Gabon.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- The genomics of insecticide resistance in Anopheles funestus: insights from a large bed-net trial.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Spatial and temporal signatures of genomic insecticide resistance in the Anopheles arabiensis mosquito malaria vector from Ethiopia.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic population structure and insecticide resistance mechanisms in the malaria vector An. coluzzii across contrasting bioclimatic zones in West Africa.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.Human population genetics and genomics · 2026Article
- Composite selection signal analysis: Uncovering candidate genes and quantitative trait loci in Indian sheep breeds.PloS one · 2026Article
242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation from standing genetic variation or recurrent de novo mutation in large populations should commonly generate soft rather than hard selective sweeps. In contrast to a hard selective sweep, in which a single adaptive haplotype rises to high population frequency, in a soft selective sweep multiple adaptive haplotypes sweep through the population simultaneously, producing distinct patterns of genetic variation in the vicinity of the adaptive site. Current statistical methods were expressly designed to detect hard sweeps and most lack power to detect soft sweeps. This is particularly unfortunate for the study of adaptation in species such as Drosophila melanogaster, where all three confirmed cases of recent adaptation resulted in soft selective sweeps and where there is evidence that the effective population size relevant for recent and strong adaptation is large enough to generate soft sweeps even when adaptation requires mutation at a specific single site at a locus. Here, we develop a statistical test based on a measure of haplotype homozygosity (H12) that is capable of detecting both hard and soft sweeps with similar power. We use H12 to identify multiple genomic regions that have undergone recent and strong adaptation in a large population sample of fully sequenced Drosophila melanogaster strains from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP). Visual inspection of the top 50 candidates reveals that in all cases multiple haplotypes are present at high frequencies, consistent with signatures of soft sweeps. We further develop a second haplotype homozygosity statistic (H2/H1) that, in combination with H12, is capable of differentiating hard from soft sweeps. Surprisingly, we find that the H12 and H2/H1 values for all top 50 peaks are much more easily generated by soft rather than hard sweeps. We discuss the implications of these results for the study of adaptation in Drosophila and in species with large census population sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.