Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25705726›Full record

ArticleProceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data2014

Empowering Personalized Medicine with Big Data and Semantic Web Technology: Promises, Challenges, and Use Cases.

Maryam Panahiazar, Vahid Taslimitehrani, Ashutosh Jadhav, Jyotishman Pathak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Knowledge Graphs of Kawasaki Disease.Health information science and systems · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Harnessing Big Data for Systems Pharmacology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Freiburg keratoconus registry : Example of application of smart data for clinical research and inititial results].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016
    Article
  20. Using e-technologies in clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam PanahiazarCenter for Science and Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Vahid TaslimitehraniOhio Center for Excellence in Knowledge-enabled Computing (kno.e.sis) College of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
Ashutosh Jadhav
Jyotishman Pathak

Funding

National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In healthcare, big data tools and technologies have the potential to create significant value by improving outcomes while lowering costs for each individual patient. Diagnostic images, genetic test results and biometric information are increasingly generated and stored in electronic health records presenting us with challenges in data that is by nature high volume, variety and velocity, thereby necessitating novel ways to store, manage and process big data. This presents an urgent need to develop new, scalable and expandable big data infrastructure and analytical methods that can enable healthcare providers access knowledge for the individual patient, yielding better decisions and outcomes. In this paper, we briefly discuss the nature of big data and the role of semantic web and data analysis for generating "smart data" which offer actionable information that supports better decision for personalized medicine. In our view, the biggest challenge is to create a system that makes big data robust and smart for healthcare providers and patients that can lead to more effective clinical decision-making, improved health outcomes, and ultimately, managing the healthcare costs. We highlight some of the challenges in using big data and propose the need for a semantic data-driven environment to address them. We illustrate our vision with practical use cases, and discuss a path for empowering personalized medicine using big data and semantic web technology.

Indexed as

Big DataHealth CarePersonalized MedicineSemantic WebSmart Data

Identifiers

PMID25705726
PMCPMC4333680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.