Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25705643›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2015

Evaluation of methods for H. pylori detection in PPI consumption using culture, rapid urease test and smear examination.

Farideh Siavoshi, Parastoo Saniee, Saman Khalili-Samani, Farideh Hosseini, Fahimeh Malakutikhah, Marzieh Mamivand, Somayeh Shahreza, Amir Houshang Sharifi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Systematic Retesting forBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Application of PCR and Microscopy to DetectThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2019
    Article
  17. Contribution of genetic amplification by PCR for the diagnosis ofUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2018
    Article
  18. Colonization ofJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Diagnostic approach toAnnals of gastroenterology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farideh Siavoshi1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Parastoo Saniee1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Saman Khalili-Samani1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Farideh Hosseini1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Fahimeh Malakutikhah1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Marzieh Mamivand1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Somayeh Shahreza1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
Amir Houshang Sharifi1 Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran ; 2 Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
University of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulture, rapid urease test (RUT) and smear examination have been used as reliable methods for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Accurate performance of these tests requires good quality biopsies with considerable number of bacterial cells. However, consumption of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affects growth and urease activity of H. pylori, leading to false negative results. In this study the efficacy of culture, RUT and smear examination was assessed and the effect of PPI consumption was evaluated.

methodsTwo antral biopsies from 530 dyspeptic patients with and without PPI consumption were used for RUT, culture and smear examination. Statistical analysis was used to determine the association between results of culture, RUT or smear examination and PPI consumption. Sensitivity and specificity of three tests were calculated by standard methods.

resultsH. pylori infection was detected in 40% of patients by culture, 48.3% by RUT and 21.1% by smear examination and the overall detection rate was 54%. A strong correlation was found between PPI consumption and negative results of culture and RUT (P<0.05) but not smear examination. The sensitivity of RUT was reduced as a result of PPI consumption. This reduction was more profound in 1-hr RUT (92.2% to 74.4%) compared with 24-hr RUT (93.9% to 81.6%).

conclusionsPrevalence of H. pylori was declined, compared with previous studies. This decrement could be due to false negative results of H. pylori diagnostic tests, among which culture and RUT are mostly affected by PPI. Accordingly, PPI consumption should be stopped before performance of endoscopy.

Indexed as

culturediagnosisH. pylorirapid urease test (RUT)smear

Identifiers

PMID25705643
PMCPMC4293475
OpenAlexW227920591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.