Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25705387›Full record

ReviewF1000prime reports2015

Spinal muscular atrophy: from tissue specificity to therapeutic strategies.

Daniel M Iascone, Christopher E Henderson, Justin C Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000prime reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Defects in Motoneuron-Astrocyte Interactions in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Huge Steps.Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel M IasconeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA ; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia Translational Neuroscience Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Christopher E HendersonDepartment of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA ; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia Translational Neuroscience Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Justin C LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA ; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia Translational Neuroscience Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007430 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GRUEBER, WESLEY B · 1999 to 2017
$6.8M
ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN NEUROBIOLOGY & BEHAVIORT32NS064928 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HENGST, ULRICH · 2010 to 2024
$3.0M
Mechanisms underlying selective motor pool vulnerability in mouse and human SMAF30AG044989 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEE, JUSTIN C · 2013 to 2015
$143k
NIA NIH HHS F30 AG044989NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007430NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the most frequent genetic cause of death in infants and toddlers. All cases of spinal muscular atrophy result from reductions in levels of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, and so SMN upregulation is a focus of many preclinical and clinical studies. We examine four issues that may be important in planning for therapeutic success. First, neuromuscular phenotypes in the SMNΔ7 mouse model closely match those in human patients but peripheral disease manifestations differ, suggesting that endpoints other than mouse lifespan may be more useful in predicting clinical outcome. Second, SMN plays important roles in multiple central and peripheral cell types, not just motor neurons, and it remains unclear which of these cell types need to be targeted therapeutically. Third, should SMN-restoration therapy not be effective in all patients, blocking molecular changes downstream of SMN reduction may confer significant benefit, making it important to evaluate therapeutic targets other than SMN. Lastly, for patients whose disease progression is slowed, but who retain significant motor dysfunction, additional approaches used to enhance regeneration of the neuromuscular system may be of value.

Identifiers

PMID25705387
PMCPMC4311279
OpenAlexW2100163011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.