Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25705185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2015

Brain responses to musical feature changes in adolescent cochlear implant users.

Bjørn Petersen, Ethan Weed, Pascale Sandmann, Elvira Brattico, Mads Hansen, Stine Derdau Sørensen, Peter Vuust

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Music-based training for pediatric CI recipients: A systematic analysis of published studies.European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Bjørn PetersenCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark ; Royal Academy of Music , Aarhus , Denmark.
Ethan WeedCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark ; Department of Aesthetics and Communication - Linguistics, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
Pascale SandmannCentral Auditory Diagnostics Lab, Department of Neurology, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany.
Elvira BratticoBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University , Aalto , Finland ; Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Mads HansenCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark ; Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
Stine Derdau SørensenDepartment of Aesthetics and Communication - Linguistics, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
Peter VuustCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark ; Royal Academy of Music , Aarhus , Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAalto University · FIAarhus University Hospital · DKMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERoyal Academy of Music · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are primarily designed to assist deaf individuals in perception of speech, although possibilities for music fruition have also been documented. Previous studies have indicated the existence of neural correlates of residual music skills in postlingually deaf adults and children. However, little is known about the behavioral and neural correlates of music perception in the new generation of prelingually deaf adolescents who grew up with CIs. With electroencephalography (EEG), we recorded the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential to changes in musical features in adolescent CI users and in normal-hearing (NH) age mates. EEG recordings and behavioral testing were carried out before (T1) and after (T2) a 2-week music training program for the CI users and in two sessions equally separated in time for NH controls. We found significant MMNs in adolescent CI users for deviations in timbre, intensity, and rhythm, indicating residual neural prerequisites for musical feature processing. By contrast, only one of the two pitch deviants elicited an MMN in CI users. This pitch discrimination deficit was supported by behavioral measures, in which CI users scored significantly below the NH level. Overall, MMN amplitudes were significantly smaller in CI users than in NH controls, suggesting poorer music discrimination ability. Despite compliance from the CI participants, we found no effect of the music training, likely resulting from the brevity of the program. This is the first study showing significant brain responses to musical feature changes in prelingually deaf adolescent CI users and their associations with behavioral measures, implying neural predispositions for at least some aspects of music processing. Future studies should test any beneficial effects of a longer lasting music intervention in adolescent CI users.

Indexed as

adolescentsauditory cortexcochlear implantsmismatch negativitymusic perceptionmusic trainingrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID25705185
PMCPMC4319402
OpenAlexW1987124057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.