Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25705182›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

The effect of retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats on incidental and active spatial learning.

A J D Nelson, E L Hindley, J M Pearce, S D Vann, J P Aggleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Visual Cortex in Context.Annual review of vision science · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cholinergic modulation of spatial learning, memory and navigation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  12. The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition.Brain and neuroscience advances · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A J D NelsonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
E L HindleySchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
J M PearceSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
S D VannSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
J P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H020187/1Wellcome Trust 090954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examined the importance of the retrosplenial cortex for the incidental learning of the spatial arrangement of distinctive features within a scene. In a modified Morris water-maze, rats spontaneously learnt the location of an escape platform prior to swimming to that location. For this, rats were repeatedly placed on a submerged platform in one corner of either a rectangular (Experiment 1) or square (Experiments 2, 3) pool with walls of different appearance. The rats were then released in the center of the pool for their first test trial. In Experiment 1, the correct corner and its diagonally opposite partner (also correct) were specified by the geometric properties of the pool. Rats with retrosplenial lesions took longer to first reach a correct corner, subsequently showing an attenuated preference for the correct corners. A reduced preference for the correct corner was also found in Experiment 2, when platform location was determined by the juxtaposition of highly salient visual cues (black vs. white walls). In Experiment 3, less salient visual cues (striped vs. white walls) led to a robust lesion impairment, as the retrosplenial lesioned rats showed no preference for the correct corner. When subsequently trained actively to swim to the correct corner over successive trials, retrosplenial lesions spared performance on all three discriminations. The findings not only reveal the importance of the retrosplenial cortex for processing various classes of visuospatial information but also highlight a broader role in the incidental learning of the features of a spatial array, consistent with the translation of scene information.

Indexed as

cingulate cortexnavigationretrosplenial cortexscene learningvisuospatial memory

Identifiers

PMID25705182
PMCPMC4319482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.