Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704858›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2015

Evaluating the efficiency of isotope transmission for improved panel design and a comparison of the detection sensitivities of mass cytometer instruments.

Sabine Tricot, Mickael Meyrand, Chiara Sammicheli, Jamila Elhmouzi-Younes, Aurélien Corneau, Sylvie Bertholet, Marie Malissen, Roger Le Grand, Sandra Nuti, Hervé Luche and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Full spectrum flow cytometry and mass cytometry: A 32-marker panel comparison.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Article
  8. CyTOFFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Immune Profiling Mass Cytometry Assay Harmonization: Multicenter Experience from CIMAC-CIDC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Challenges in the Multivariate Analysis of Mass Cytometry Data: The Effect of Randomization.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Titrating Complex Mass Cytometry Panels.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Optimization of Receptor Occupancy Assays in Mass Cytometry: Standardization Across Channels with QSC Beads.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine TricotCEA, Division of Immuno-Virology, IDMIT Center, Institute for Emerging Diseases and Innovative Therapies (iMETI), DSV, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Université Paris-Sud, UMR E1, Orsay, France; Vaccine Research Institute (VRI), Créteil, France.
Mickael Meyrand
Chiara Sammicheli
Jamila Elhmouzi-Younes
Aurélien Corneau
Sylvie Bertholet
Marie Malissen
Roger Le Grand
Sandra Nuti
Hervé Luche
Antonio Cosma
Novartis (Italy) · ITUniversité Paris-Sud · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Recherche Vaccinale · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent introduction of mass cytometry, a technique coupling a cell introduction system generating a stream of single cells with mass spectrometry, has greatly increased the number of parameters that can be measured per single cell. As with all new technology there is a need for dissemination of standardization and quality control procedures. Here, we characterize variations in sensitivity observed across the mass range of a mass cytometer, using different lanthanide tags. We observed a five-fold difference in lanthanide detection over the mass range and demonstrated that each instrument has its own sensitivity pattern. Therefore, the selection of lanthanide combinations is a key step in the establishment of a staining panel for mass cytometry-based experiments, particularly for multicenter studies. We propose the sensitivity pattern as the basis for panel design, instrument standardization and future implementation of normalization algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAntibodiesCells, CulturedFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesIsotopesLanthanoid Series ElementsMass SpectrometryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpleenStaining and LabelingAntibodiesFluorescent DyesIsotopesLanthanoid Series ElementsCyTOFflow cytometryKey terms: mass cytometrystandardization

Identifiers

PMID25704858
OpenAlexW2103397937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.