Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704723›Full record

ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2016

Microparticle analysis in disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis.

Micah J Mooberry, Nigel S Key

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Platelet-derived microvesicles (PMVs) in cancer progression and clinical applications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. JAK2V617F-Positive Endothelial Cells Induce Apoptosis and Release JAK2V617F-Positive MicroparticlesTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms and biomarkers of cancer-associated thrombosis.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Microparticles (Exosomes) and Atherosclerosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Micah J MooberryDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Nigel S KeyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Duke-UNC Clinical Hematology Research Career Development ProgramK12HL087097 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TELEN, MARILYN J · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL087097NHLBI NIH HHS K12HL087097-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microparticles (MPs) are submicron vesicles released from the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells in response to activation or apoptosis. MPs are known to be involved in numerous biologic processes, including inflammation, the immune response, cancer metastasis, and angiogenesis. Their earliest recognized and most widely accepted role, however, is the ability to promote and support the process of blood coagulation. Consequently, there is ongoing interest in studying MPs in disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis. Both phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and the presence of tissue factor (TF) in the MP membrane may account for their procoagulant properties, and elevated numbers of MPs in plasma have been reported in numerous prothrombotic conditions. To date, however, there are few data on true causality linking MPs to the genesis of thrombosis. A variety of methodologies have been employed to characterize and quantify MPs, although detection is challenging due to their submicron size. Flow cytometry (FCM) remains the most frequently utilized strategy for MP detection; however, it is associated with significant technological limitations. Additionally, preanalytical and analytical variables can influence the detection of MPs by FCM, rendering data interpretation difficult. Lack of methodologic standardization in MP analysis by FCM confounds the issue further, although efforts are currently underway to address this limitation. Moving forward, it will be important to address these technical challenges as a scientific community if we are to better understand the role that MPs play in disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis.

Indexed as

HemostasisAnimalsBlood PlateletsCell-Derived MicroparticlesFlow CytometryHumansThrombosiscoagulationflow cytometryhemostasismicroparticlesmicrovesiclesthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID25704723
PMCPMC4545474
OpenAlexW1961179763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.