Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704660›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2015

A proposal: Evolution of PCNA's role as a marker of newly replicated DNA.

Roxana Georgescu, Lance Langston, Mike O'Donnell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prime Editing in Dividing and Quiescent Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Structure of eukaryotic DNA polymerase δ bound to the PCNA clamp while encircling DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pivotal roles of PCNA loading and unloading in heterochromatin function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Mechanism of opening a sliding clamp.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Replisome.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roxana GeorgescuRockefeller University and HHMI, 1230 York Avenue, Box 228, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Lance LangstonRockefeller University and HHMI, 1230 York Avenue, Box 228, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Mike O'DonnellRockefeller University and HHMI, 1230 York Avenue, Box 228, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: odonnel@rockefeller.edu.
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISM OF DNA POLYMERASE III HOLOENZYMER01GM038839 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI O'DONNELL, MICHAEL E · 1988 to 2014
$2.9M
Biochemical Mechanism and Structure of the Eukaryotic Replication ForkR01GM115809 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONNELL, MICHAEL E · 2015 to 2022
$2.6M
BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISM OF DNA POLYMERASE III HOLOENZYMER37GM038839 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONNELL, MICHAEL E · 1997 to 2006
$2.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM38839NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038839NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115809NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM038839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processivity clamps that hold DNA polymerases to DNA for processivity were the first proteins known to encircle the DNA duplex. At the time, polymerase processivity was thought to be the only function of ring shaped processivity clamps. But studies from many laboratories have identified numerous proteins that bind and function with sliding clamps. Among these processes are mismatch repair and nucleosome assembly. Interestingly, there exist polymerases that are highly processive and do not require clamps. Hence, DNA polymerase processivity does not intrinsically require that sliding clamps evolved for this purpose. We propose that polymerases evolved to require clamps as a way of ensuring that clamps are deposited on newly replicated DNA. These clamps are then used on the newly replicated daughter strands, for processes important to genomic integrity, such as mismatch repair and the assembly of nucleosomes to maintain epigenetic states of replicating cells during development.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationEvolution, MolecularBacteriaDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEukaryotaHumansProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNA replicationPCNAβ-Clamp

Identifiers

PMID25704660
PMCPMC4426064
OpenAlexW2081146811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.