Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704511›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2015

An oncologist׳s friend: How Xenopus contributes to cancer research.

Laura J A Hardwick, Anna Philpott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Organelle size scaling over embryonic development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Review
  12. The Zahn drawings: new illustrations ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Research proceedings on amphibian model organisms.Dong wu xue yan jiu = Zoological research · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura J A HardwickDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK.
Anna PhilpottDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK. Electronic address: ap113@cam.ac.uk.
Hutchison/MRC Research Centre · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500101Medical Research Council G0700758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most striking features of the Xenopus system is the versatility in providing a unique range of both in vitro and in vivo models that are rapid, accessible and easily manipulated. Here we present an overview of the diverse contribution that Xenopus has made to advance our understanding of tumour biology and behaviour; a contribution that goes beyond the traditional view of Xenopus as a developmental model organism. From the utility of the egg and oocyte extract system to the use of whole embryos as developmental or induced tumour models, the Xenopus system has been fundamental to investigation of cell cycle mechanisms, cell metabolism, cell signalling and cell behaviour, and has allowed an increasing appreciation of the parallels between early development and the pathogenesis of tumour progression and metastasis. Although not the prototypical oncological model system, we propose that Xenopus is an adaptable and multifunctional tool in the oncologist׳s arsenal.

Indexed as

XenopusAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEpigenesis, GeneticEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansMedical OncologyMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsOncogenesOocytesSignal TransductionTranslational Research, BiomedicalCancerModelOncogenesisTumourXenopus

Identifiers

PMID25704511
PMCPMC4684227
OpenAlexW2032532142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.