Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704194›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2015

The GPCR heterotetramer: challenging classical pharmacology.

Sergi Ferré

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. pyGOMoDo: GPCRs modeling and docking with python.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A network of GαScience signaling · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Allosteric Interactions between Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A Paradigm for Peptide Hormone-GPCR Analyses.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergi FerréIntegrative Neurobiology Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Triad Technology Building, 333 Cassell Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address: sferre@intra.nida.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neurotransmitter Receptor Heteromers in the Striatal Spine ModuleZIADA000493 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI FERRE, SERGI · 2009 to 2025
$35.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two concepts are gaining increasing acceptance in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pharmacology: (i) pre-coupling of GPCRs with their preferred signaling molecules, and (ii) GPCR oligomerization. This is begging for the introduction of new models such as GPCR oligomer-containing signaling complexes with GPCR homodimers as functional building blocks. This model favors the formation of GPCR heterotetramers - heteromers of homodimers coupled to their cognate G protein. The GPCR heterotetramer offers an optimal framework for a canonical antagonistic interaction between activated Gs and Gi proteins, which can simultaneously bind to their respective preferred receptors and to adenylyl cyclase (AC) catalytic units. This review addresses the current evidence for pre-coupling of the various specific components that provide the very elaborate signaling machinery exemplified by the Gs-Gi-AC-coupled GPCR heterotetramer.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledadenylyl cyclaseGPCRoligomerizationsignalosome

Identifiers

PMID25704194
PMCPMC4357316
OpenAlexW2090733696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.