Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25704094›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Higher-level phylogeny of paraneopteran insects inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences.

Hu Li, Renfu Shao, Nan Song, Fan Song, Pei Jiang, Zhihong Li, Wanzhi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Functional annotation and comparative analysis of fourSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hu Li1] Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China [2] Department of Ornamental Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China.
Renfu ShaoGeneCology Research Centre, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Nan Song1] Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China [2] College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan. 450002, China.
Fan SongDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China.
Pei JiangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China.
Zhihong LiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China.
Wanzhi CaiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing. 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial (mt) genome data have been proven to be informative for animal phylogenetic studies but may also suffer from systematic errors, due to the effects of accelerated substitution rate and compositional heterogeneity. We analyzed the mt genomes of 25 insect species from the four paraneopteran orders, aiming to better understand how accelerated substitution rate and compositional heterogeneity affect the inferences of the higher-level phylogeny of this diverse group of hemimetabolous insects. We found substantial heterogeneity in base composition and contrasting rates in nucleotide substitution among these paraneopteran insects, which complicate the inference of higher-level phylogeny. The phylogenies inferred with concatenated sequences of mt genes using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods and homogeneous models failed to recover Psocodea and Hemiptera as monophyletic groups but grouped, instead, the taxa that had accelerated substitution rates together, including Sternorrhyncha (a suborder of Hemiptera), Thysanoptera, Phthiraptera and Liposcelididae (a family of Psocoptera). Bayesian inference with nucleotide sequences and heterogeneous models (CAT and CAT + GTR), however, recovered Psocodea, Thysanoptera and Hemiptera each as a monophyletic group. Within Psocodea, Liposcelididae is more closely related to Phthiraptera than to other species of Psocoptera. Furthermore, Thysanoptera was recovered as the sister group to Hemiptera.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialAnimalsBase SequenceBayes TheoremHemipteraInsectaLikelihood FunctionsMitochondriaModels, BiologicalSequence Analysis, DNAThysanoptera

Identifiers

PMID25704094
PMCPMC4336943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.