Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25703505›Full record

ReviewAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2015

The pharmacogenetics of alcohol use disorder.

Jermaine D Jones, Sandra D Comer, Henry R Kranzler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Carnitine in Alcohol Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2021
    Article
  13. Alcohol Use Disorder: The Role of Medication in Recovery.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pharmacogenetics of alcohol use disorder treatments: an update.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jermaine D JonesDivision on Substance Abuse , New York State Psychiatric Institute & Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Sandra D Comer
Henry R Kranzler
Columbia University · USNew York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Prescription Opioid Effects in Drug and Non-drug AbusersR01DA016759 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI COMER, SANDRA D · 2003 to 2014
$5.0M
Novel Approaches to Alcoholism Pharmacotherapy and RiskK24AA013736 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KRANZLER, HENRY RICHARD · 2002 to 2012
$1.5M
Contribution of Various Genetic Polymorphisms to Oxycodone's Abuse LiabilityK01DA030446 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI JONES, JERMAINE D · 2011 to 2015
$907k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA013736NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA013736NIDA NIH HHS DA016759NIDA NIH HHS DA030446NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA030446NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, the use and abuse of alcohol contributes to millions of deaths and billions of dollars in societal costs. To determine the impact of genetic variation on the susceptibility to the disorder and its response to treatment, studies have been conducted to assess the contribution of a variety of candidate genetic variants. These variants, which we review here, were chosen based upon their observed or hypothesized functional relevance to alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk or to the mechanism by which medications used to treat the disorder exert their effects.

methodsThis qualitative review examines studies in which candidate polymorphisms were tested as moderator variables to identify pharmacogenetic effects on either the subjective response to alcohol or the outcomes of pharmacotherapy.

resultsAlthough findings from these studies provide evidence of a number of clinically relevant pharmacogenetic effects, the literature is limited and there are conflicting findings that require resolution.

conclusionsPharmacogenetic studies of AUD treatment that use greater methodological rigor and better statistical controls, such as corrections for multiple testing, may help to resolve inconsistent findings. These procedures could also lead to the discovery of more robust and clinically meaningful moderator effects. As the field evolves through methodological standardization and the use of larger study samples, pharmacogenetic research has the potential to inform clinical care by enhancing therapeutic effects and personalizing treatments. These efforts may also provide insights into the mechanisms by which medications reduce heavy drinking or promote abstinence in patients with an AUD.

Indexed as

Alcohol-Related DisordersGenetic VariationHumansPharmacogeneticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlcohol Use Disorder and AlcoholismCandidate-GenePharmacogeneticsPharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25703505
PMCPMC4348335
OpenAlexW2149660440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.