Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25703185›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2015

Impact of dietary deviation on disease progression and gut microbiome composition in lupus-prone SNF1 mice.

B M Johnson, M-C Gaudreau, M M Al-Gadban, R Gudi, C Vasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B M JohnsonDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology.
M-C GaudreauDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology.
M M Al-GadbanDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology.
R GudiDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology.
C VasuDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology.

Funding

Dendritic cell directed T cell negative regulation for treating autoimmunityR01AI073858 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI VASU, CHENTHAMARAKSHAN · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental factors, including microbes and diet, play a key role in initiating autoimmunity in genetically predisposed individuals. However, the influence of gut microflora in the initiation and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is not well understood. In this study, we have examined the impact of drinking water pH on immune response, disease incidence and gut microbiome in a spontaneous mouse model of SLE. Our results show that (SWR × NZB) F1 (SNF1 ) mice that were given acidic pH water (AW) developed nephritis at a slower pace compared to those on neutral pH water (NW). Immunological analyses revealed that the NW-recipient mice carry relatively higher levels of circulating autoantibodies against nuclear antigen (nAg) as well as plasma cells. Importantly, 16S rRNA gene-targeted sequencing revealed that the composition of gut microbiome is significantly different between NW and AW groups of mice. In addition, analysis of cytokine and transcription factor expression revealed that immune response in the gut mucosa of NW recipient mice is dominated by T helper type 17 (Th17) and Th9-associated factors. Segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) promote a Th17 response and autoimmunity in mouse models of arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Interestingly, however, not only was SFB colonization unaffected by the pH of drinking water, but also SFB failed to cause a profound increase in Th17 response and had no significant effect on lupus incidence. Overall, these observations show that simple dietary deviations such as the pH of drinking water can influence lupus incidence and affect the composition of gut microbiome.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, AntinuclearBacteroidesClostridiumCrosses, GeneticCyanobacteriaCytokinesDisease ProgressionDrinking WaterFemaleGastrointestinal TractGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLactobacillusLupus NephritisMaleAntibodies, AntinuclearCytokinesDrinking WaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sautoimmunitydrinking water pHimmune modulationmicrobiotasegmented filamentous bacteriasystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID25703185
PMCPMC4516448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.