Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25703037›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2015

Divergence of craniofacial developmental trajectories among avian embryos.

Francis J Smith, Christopher J Percival, Nathan M Young, Diane Hu, Richard A Schneider, Ralph S Marcucio, Benedikt Hallgrimsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neural crest and the origin of species-specific pattern.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Quantifying three-dimensional morphology and RNA from individual embryos.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francis J SmithDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Canada.
Christopher J PercivalDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Canada.
Nathan M YoungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco General Hospital, The University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Diane HuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco General Hospital, The University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Richard A SchneiderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Ralph S MarcucioDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco General Hospital, The University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Benedikt HallgrimssonDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

TEMPORAL REGULATION OF CRANIAL SKELETOGENESISR01DE016402 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RICHARD A SCHNEIDER · 2004 to 2026
$8.2M
The role of continuous phenotypic variation in structural defects of the faceR01DE019638 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Benedikt Hallgrimsson, Ralph S Marcucio · 2010 to 2026
$7.3M
Developmental mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype correlationsR01DE021708 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HALLGRIMSSON, BENEDIKT, MARCUCIO, RALPH S · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016402NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019638NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphological divergence among related species involves changes to developmental processes. When such variation arises in development has garnered considerable theoretical interest relating to the broader issue of how development may constrain evolutionary change. The hourglass model holds that while early developmental events may be highly evolvable, there is a phylotypic stage when key developmental events are conserved. Thus, evolutionary divergence among related species should tend to arise after such a stage of reduced evolvability and, consequently, reduced variation among species. We test this prediction by comparing developmental trajectories among three avian species of varying relatedness (chick, quail, and duck) to locate their putative point of divergence. Three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and trajectory analyses were used to measure the significance of the facial shape variation observed among these species.

resultsDuck embryos, being more distantly related, differed from the more closely-related chick and quail embryos in the enlargement of their frontonasal prominences. Phenotypic trajectory analyses demonstrated divergence of the three species, most notably, duck.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that the two more closely related species share similar facial morphologies for a longer time during development, while ducks diverge. This suggests a surprising lability of craniofacial development during early face formation. Developmental Dynamics 244:1158-1167, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

allometrychickdevelopmentduckfacial shapegeometric morphometricsphenotypic trajectoryquail

Identifiers

PMID25703037
PMCPMC4544654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.