Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25702933›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Powder cocaine and crack use in the United States: an examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use.

Joseph J Palamar, Shelby Davies, Danielle C Ompad, Charles M Cleland, Michael Weitzman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Network Science Approach to Sex-Polydrug Use Among Black Sexually Minoritized Men and Transgender Women: The N2 Cohort Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Housing Instability Associated with Return to Stimulant Use among Previously Abstaining Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph J PalamarDepartment of Population Health, New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center, United States; Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, NYU College of Nursing, United States; Center for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, NYU, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, United States. Electronic address: joseph.palamar@nyumc.org.
Shelby DaviesDepartments of Pediatrics and Environmental Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, United States.
Danielle C OmpadCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, NYU College of Nursing, United States; Center for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, NYU, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, United States; Global Institute of Public Health, New York University, United States.
Charles M ClelandCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, NYU College of Nursing, United States; NYU College of Nursing, New York, NY, United States.
Michael WeitzmanDepartments of Pediatrics and Environmental Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, United States.
NYU Langone Health · USGlobal Policy Institute · USNew York College of Health Professions · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn light of the current sentencing disparity (18:1) between crack and powder cocaine possession in the United States, we examined socioeconomic correlates of use of each, and relations between use and arrest, to determine who may be at highest risk for arrest and imprisonment.

methodsWe conducted secondary data analyses on the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2009-2012. Data were analyzed for adults age ≥ 18 to determine associations between use and arrest. Socioeconomic correlates of lifetime and annual use of powder cocaine and of crack were delineated using multivariable logistic regression and correlates of frequency of recent use were examined using generalized negative binomial regression.

resultsCrack users were at higher risk than powder cocaine users for reporting a lifetime arrest or multiple recent arrests. Racial minorities were at low risk for powder cocaine use and Hispanics were at low risk for crack use. Blacks were at increased risk for lifetime and recent crack use, but not when controlling for other socioeconomic variables. However, blacks who did use either powder cocaine or crack tended to use at higher frequencies. Higher education and higher family income were negatively associated with crack use although these factors were sometimes risk factors for powder cocaine use.

conclusionsCrack users are at higher risk of arrest and tend to be of lower socioeconomic status compared to powder cocaine users. These findings can inform US Congress as they review bills (e.g., The Smarter Sentencing Act), which would help eliminate cocaine-related sentencing disparities.

Indexed as

Crack CocaineAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCocaine-Related DisordersCrimeEducational StatusFemaleHealth SurveysHispanic or LatinoHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedPowdersCrack CocainePowdersArrestCocaineCrackDisparitiesSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID25702933
PMCPMC4533860
OpenAlexW2004961393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.