Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25702920›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2015

Operant self-administration of sweetened ethanol and time course of blood ethanol levels in adolescent and adult male Long-Evans rats.

James M Doherty, Rueben A Gonzales

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M DohertyWaggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research , University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Pharmacology , College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Rueben A Gonzales
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Neurochemical & Behavioral Correlates of ETOH EffectsT32AA007471 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Kimberly Nixon · 1987 to 2026
$9.2M
Neurochemical mechanisms of ethanol self-administrationR37AA011852 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GONZALES, RUEBEN A. · 2009 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA011852NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA11852NIAAA NIH HHS R37AA1185209NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA00747NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007471NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA007471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known regarding mechanisms regulating ethanol (EtOH) self-administration during adolescence or if the mechanisms differ from adults. One of the best models of abuse liability is operant self-administration. Therefore, we characterized operant sweetened EtOH self-administration behavior in adolescent and adult rats.

methodsAdolescent (36 days old at first EtOH exposure) and adult male Long-Evans rats were first trained to self-administer 10% sucrose (10S) in an appetitive/consummatory operant model for 1 week, and then the drinking solution was switched to 10% sucrose plus 10% EtOH (10S10E) for 2 weeks. Next, rats were switched to a fixed ratio 2 schedule, and this was followed by 1 session using a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Last, rats were tested for cue-induced reinstatement of lever-pressing behavior under extinction conditions after 13 days of abstinence. Blood EtOH concentration (BEC) of sweetened EtOH (self-administered or intragastric [IG] administration of 1 g/kg) was determined via gas chromatography. Control rats drank only 10S.

resultsConsumption of sweetened EtOH was not different between adolescents and adults under any schedule tested, reaching 1 g/kg in 20 minutes in the appetitive/consummatory model. Appetitive behavior directed at sweetened EtOH was less focused in adolescents versus adults. No age differences were found in motivation for sweetened EtOH. Cue-induced reinstatement of EtOH-seeking behavior after abstinence also did not differ by age. In control groups, no age difference was found in appetitive behavior or the amount of sucrose consumed, although adults exhibited greater cue-induced reinstatement. BEC after self-administration or IG administration of sweetened EtOH was higher in adults than adolescents.

conclusionsConsumption and motivation for sweetened EtOH are similar in adolescents and adults, although adolescents are more vulnerable to the effects of EtOH consumption on appetitive behavior. The IG results suggest larger volume of distribution and higher first-pass metabolism of sweetened EtOH in adolescents versus adults, which may limit the reinforcing effects of EtOH in some adolescents. Overall, we have begun to establish an operant sweetened EtOH self-administration model in adolescent rats.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsConditioning, OperantEthanolMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansSelf AdministrationSweetening AgentsTime FactorsEthanolSweetening AgentsDevelopmentJuvenileOperantPeriadolescentRelapse

Identifiers

PMID25702920
PMCPMC4348201
OpenAlexW2019939059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.