Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25702582›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Development of connectivity in a motoneuronal network in Drosophila larvae.

Louise Couton, Alex S Mauss, Temur Yunusov, Soeren Diegelmann, Jan Felix Evers, Matthias Landgraf

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Logic of Synaptic Diversity BetweenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TheFrontiers in neural circuits · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gap Junction-Mediated Signaling from Motor Neurons Regulates Motor Generation in the Central Circuits of LarvalThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Neural Circuits Underlying Fly Larval Locomotion.Current pharmaceutical design · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise CoutonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Alex S MaussDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Temur YunusovDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Soeren DiegelmannDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Jan Felix EversDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK; Centre for Organismal Studies, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: jan-felix.evers@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
Matthias LandgrafDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I022414/1Wellcome Trust WT075934Wellcome Trust WT079204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuch of our understanding of how neural networks develop is based on studies of sensory systems, revealing often highly stereotyped patterns of connections, particularly as these diverge from the presynaptic terminals of sensory neurons. We know considerably less about the wiring strategies of motor networks, where connections converge onto the dendrites of motoneurons. Here, we investigated patterns of synaptic connections between identified motoneurons with sensory neurons and interneurons in the motor network of the Drosophila larva and how these change as it develops.

resultsWe find that as animals grow, motoneurons increase the number of synapses with existing presynaptic partners. Different motoneurons form characteristic cell-type-specific patterns of connections. At the same time, there is considerable variability in the number of synapses formed on motoneuron dendrites, which contrasts with the stereotypy reported for presynaptic terminals of sensory neurons. Where two motoneurons of the same cell type contact a common interneuron partner, each postsynaptic cell can arrive at a different connectivity outcome. Experimentally changing the positioning of motoneuron dendrites shows that the geography of dendritic arbors in relation to presynaptic partner terminals is an important determinant in shaping patterns of connectivity.

conclusionsIn the Drosophila larval motor network, the sets of connections that form between identified neurons manifest an unexpected level of variability. Synapse number and the likelihood of forming connections appear to be regulated on a cell-by-cell basis, determined primarily by the postsynaptic dendrites of motoneuron terminals.

Indexed as

ConnectomeModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAnimalsDrosophilaLarvaMicroscopy, ConfocalMotor NeuronsSensory Receptor CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID25702582
PMCPMC4353686
OpenAlexW2091337468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.