Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25702577›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Drosophila sugar receptors in sweet taste perception, olfaction, and internal nutrient sensing.

Shinsuke Fujii, Ahmet Yavuz, Jesse Slone, Christopher Jagge, Xiangyu Song, Hubert Amrein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinsuke Fujii *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Ahmet Yavuz *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Jesse SloneDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Christopher JaggeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Xiangyu SongDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Hubert AmreinDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Texas A&M Health Science Center College Station TX, 77845.
Texas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

Taste Receptor Genes and Sensory CodingR01DC005606 · NIDCD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI AMREIN, HUBERT O · 2004 to 2020
$4.5M
From Pheromone Receptors to Social BehaviorsR01DC009014 · NIDCD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI AMREIN, HUBERT O · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Regulation of Feeding Behavior by Brain-based Nutrient SensorsR01DC013967 · NIDCD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI AMREIN, HUBERT O · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005606NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC005606NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009014NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC009014NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of nutritious compounds is dependent on expression of specific taste receptors in appropriate taste-cell types [1]. In contrast to mammals, which rely on a single, broadly tuned heterodimeric sugar receptor [2], the Drosophila genome harbors a small subfamily of eight, closely related gustatory receptor (Gr) genes, Gr5a, Gr61a, and Gr64a-Gr64f, of which three have been proposed to mediate sweet taste [3-6]. However, expression and function of several of these putative sugar Gr genes are not known. Here, we present a comprehensive expression and functional analysis using Gr(LEXA/GAL4) alleles that were generated through homologous recombination. We show that sugar Gr genes are expressed in a combinatorial manner to yield at least eight sets of sweet-sensing neurons. Behavioral investigations show that most sugar Gr mutations affect taste responses to only a small number of sugars and that effective detection of most sugars is dependent on more than one Gr gene. Surprisingly, Gr64a, one of three Gr genes previously proposed to play a major role in sweet taste [3, 4], is not expressed in labellar taste neurons, and Gr64a mutant flies exhibit normal sugar responses elicited from the labellum. Our analysis provides a molecular rationale for distinct tuning profiles of sweet taste neurons, and it favors a model whereby all sugar Grs contribute to sweet taste. Furthermore, expression in olfactory organs and the brain implies novel roles for sugar Gr genes in olfaction and internal nutrient sensing, respectively. Thus, sugar receptors may contribute to feeding behavior via multiple sensory systems.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBrainDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFeeding BehaviorGene ComponentsGene Expression ProfilingGene Knock-In TechniquesHomologous RecombinationNeuronsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSensillaSmellTaste PerceptionDrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, DrosophilaReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID25702577
PMCPMC4711800
OpenAlexW1983620845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.