ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2015
Characterization of ventricular assist device-mediated sensitization in the bridge-to-heart-transplantation patient.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- HLA Sensitization in Patients Bridged to Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Impact of Previous Conventional Cardiac Surgery on the Clinical Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Understanding the Correlation Between DSA, Complement Activation, and Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients.Transplantation · 2018Article
- Ventricular assist device elicits serum natural IgG that correlates with the development of primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2017Article
- Desensitization Strategies Pre- and Post-Cardiac Transplantation.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2016Article
- Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
- High-speed visualization of disturbed pathlines in axial flow ventricular assist device under pulsatile conditions.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVentricular assist devices (VADs) are associated with increased anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody production. The purpose of this study is to characterize differences in sensitization patterns in patients receiving axial flow, implantable VADs versus pulsatile, paracorporeal biventricular assist devices (BIVADs) as bridges to transplantation.
methodsThe study is a retrospective review of 68 patients who were bridged to transplantation with either a VAD or a BIVAD, as described, from January 2007 to June 2010, at a university medical center.
resultsFive of 15 (33.3%) VAD patients became sensitized during treatment, compared with 30 of 53 (56.6%) BIVAD patients, P = .15. Multivariable analysis comparing BIVAD with VAD, while controlling for previous cardiac surgery, pregnancy, and packed red blood cell transfusion produced an odds ratio of 2.99, P = .14. Of sensitized patients, all 5 (100%) of the VAD patients had pre-existing antibodies before VAD placement, compared with 9 of 30 (30.0%) BIVAD patients, P = .006. Maximum cumulative mean fluorescence intensities for BIVAD were 46,259 ± 66,349 versus 42,540 ± 12,840 for VAD, P = .90. Time to maximum antibody expression was shorter for the VAD group (34 ± 28 days vs 5.8 ± 9 days, P = .04).
conclusionsDevice type was not a factor in patient sensitization after implantation. However, VAD patients required pre-existing sensitization before implantation to produce antibodies during their treatment interval, whereas more than two thirds of BIVAD patients developed de novo antibodies. These data suggest that the mechanism of sensitization between VAD and BIVAD patients may differ, and further mechanistic studies into the impact of device types on patient sensitization are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.