Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25701568›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

AIDA: ab initio domain assembly for automated multi-domain protein structure prediction and domain-domain interaction prediction.

Dong Xu, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Zhanwen Li, Adam Godzik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Homology modeling in the time of collective and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Dong XuBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Lukasz JaroszewskiBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Zhanwen LiBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Adam GodzikBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla, CA 92093-0446, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

Development of the flexible comparative modeling toolkitR01GM101457 · NIGMS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI GODZIK, ADAM · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM101457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMost proteins consist of multiple domains, independent structural and evolutionary units that are often reshuffled in genomic rearrangements to form new protein architectures. Template-based modeling methods can often detect homologous templates for individual domains, but templates that could be used to model the entire query protein are often not available.

resultsWe have developed a fast docking algorithm ab initio domain assembly (AIDA) for assembling multi-domain protein structures, guided by the ab initio folding potential. This approach can be extended to discontinuous domains (i.e. domains with 'inserted' domains). When tested on experimentally solved structures of multi-domain proteins, the relative domain positions were accurately found among top 5000 models in 86% of cases. AIDA server can use domain assignments provided by the user or predict them from the provided sequence. The latter approach is particularly useful for automated protein structure prediction servers. The blind test consisting of 95 CASP10 targets shows that domain boundaries could be successfully determined for 97% of targets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The AIDA package as well as the benchmark sets used here are available for download at http://ffas.burnham.org/AIDA/. CONTACT: adam@sanfordburnham.org SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalProtein ConformationSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansInternetProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID25701568
PMCPMC4481839
OpenAlexW2170449429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.