Detection of Advanced Neoplasia with FIT Versus Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Versus Colonoscopy: More Is More.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies.European journal of epidemiology · 2018
   Article
2. Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Comprehensive Review to Recent Non-Invasive Methods.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2017
   Review
3. Diagnosis reliability of combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal-immunochemical test in colorectal neoplasia screening.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical test and sigmoidoscopy for advanced right-sided colorectal neoplasms.2015

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as