ReviewDer Anaesthesist2015
[Coping with complex medical emergency situations : Competent and successful decision-making, communication and leadership].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07605897 (A Single-Center, Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Quality, and Tolerance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives in a United States Veteran Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-Center, Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Quality, and Tolerance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives in a United States Veteran Population
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Best practice-example of a paramedic competence system in the context of user and patient safety: the Reutlinger Weg].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2022Review
- Development of an Adapted Model for Decision-Making to Improve Reasoning and Risk Assessment in an Emergency Team: A Prospective Simulation Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStress is an integral part of the daily routine among healthcare workers in anesthesiology and emergency medicine.
objectivesThis article describes negative stress effects in complex emergency situations and presents helpful tools for coping with them. MATERIAL AND
methodsEvaluation and discussion of selected medical and psychological publications and the inclusion of expert opinions are presented.
resultsNegative stress of healthcare providers in medical emergencies severely affects their reasoning and communication and is inadequately taken into account during routine care.
conclusionResearch in aviation and psychology has provided various tools to improve performance during stressful events and should be taken into consideration for routine daily use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25701067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.