ArticlePlant cell reports2015
Transformation of rice with large maize genomic DNA fragments containing high content repetitive sequences.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arabidopsis F-box proteins D5BF1 and D5BF2 negatively regulate Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and tumorigenesis.Molecular plant pathology · 2024Article
- Identification and characterization of Sr22b, a new allele of the wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr22 effective against the Ug99 race group.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- OsbZIP81, A Homologue of Arabidopsis VIP1, May Positively Regulate JA Levels by Directly Targetting the Genes in JA Signaling and Metabolism Pathway in Rice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Genetic Modification for Wheat Improvement: From Transgenesis to Genome Editing.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- An assessment of transgenomics as a tool for gene discovery in Populus euphratica Oliv.Plant molecular biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Molecular and FISH analyses of a 53-kbp intact DNA fragment inserted by biolistics in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome.Plant cell reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageLarge and complex maize BIBAC inserts, even with a length of about 164 kb and repeat sequences of 88.1%, were transferred into rice. The BIBAC vector has been established to clone large DNA fragments and directly transfer them into plants. Previously, we have constructed a maize B73 BIBAC library and demonstrated that the BIBAC clones were stable in Agrobacterium. In this study, we demonstrated that the maize BIBAC clones could be used for rice genetic transformation through Agrobacterium-mediated method, although the average transformation efficiency for the BIBAC clones (0.86%) is much lower than that for generally used binary vectors containing small DNA fragments (15.24%). The 164-kb B73 genomic DNA insert of the BIBAC clone B2-6 containing five maize gene models and 88.1% of repetitive sequences was transferred into rice. In 18.75% (3/16) of the T1, 13.79% (4/29) of the T2, and 5.26% (1/19) of the T3 generation transgenic rice plants positive for the GUS and HYG marker genes, all the five maize genes can be detected. To our knowledge, this is the largest and highest content of repeat sequence-containing DNA fragment that was successfully transferred into plants. Gene expression analysis (RT-PCR) showed that the expression of three out of five genes could be detected in the leaves of the transgenic rice plants. Our study showed a potential to massively use maize genome resource for rice breeding by mass transformation of rice with large maize genomic DNA fragment BIBAC clones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25700981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.