Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25700849›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Massachusetts health reform and disparities in joint replacement use: difference in differences study.

Amresh D Hanchate, Alok Kapoor, Jeffrey N Katz, Danny McCormick, Karen E Lasser, Chen Feng, Meredith G Manze, Nancy R Kressin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amresh D HanchateVA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA hanchate@bu.edu.
Alok KapoorUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jeffrey N KatzBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
Danny McCormickCambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Karen E LasserBoston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Chen FengBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Meredith G ManzeCity University of New York, School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Nancy R KressinVA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Center for Health Insurance Reform, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and DisparitiesU01HL105342 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRESSIN, NANCY R. · 2010 to 2014
$5.6M
National Estimates for Inpatient Care, Outcomes & Hospital Effect among HispanicsR01MD007705 · NIMHD · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI HANCHATE, AMRESH D · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
Racial & Ethnic Disparities in Incidence and Inpatient Outcomes of Acute StrokeR21NS062677 · NINDS · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI HANCHATE, AMRESH D · 2009 to 2010
$415k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1U01HL105342-01NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105342NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS062677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the impact of the insurance expansion in 2006 on use of knee and hip replacement procedures by race/ethnicity, area income, and the use of hospitals that predominantly serve poor people ("safety net hospitals").

designQuasi-experimental difference in differences study examining change after reform in the share of procedures performed in safety net hospitals by race/ethnicity and area income, with adjustment for patients' residence, demographics, and comorbidity.

settingState of Massachusetts, United States.

participantsMassachusetts residents aged 40-64 as the target beneficiaries of reform and similarly aged residents of New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania as the comparison (control) population. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Number of knee and hip replacement procedures per 10 000 population and use of safety net hospitals. Procedure counts from state discharge data for 2.5 years before and after reform, and multivariate difference in differences. Poisson regression was used to adjust for demographics, economic conditions, secular time, and geographic factors to estimate the change in procedure rate associated with health reform by race/ethnicity and area income.

resultsBefore reform, the number of procedures (/10 000) in Massachusetts was lower among Hispanic people (12.9, P<0.001) than black people (28.1) and white people (30.1). Overall, procedure use increased 22.4% during the 2.5 years after insurance expansion; reform in Massachusetts was associated with a 4.7% increase. The increase associated with reform was significantly higher among Hispanic people (37.9%, P<0.001) and black people (11.4%, P<0.05) than among white people (2.8%). Lower income was not associated with larger increases in procedure use. The share of knee and hip replacement procedures performed in safety net hospitals in Massachusetts decreased by 1.0% from a level of 12.7% before reform. The reduction was larger among Hispanic people (-6.4%, P<0.001) than white people (-1.0%), and among low income residents (-3.9%, p<0.001) than high income residents (0%).

conclusionsInsurance expansion can help reduce disparities by race/ethnicity but not by income in access to elective surgical care and could shift some elective surgical care away from safety net hospitals.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformAdolescentAdultArthroplasty, ReplacementEthnicityFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSafety-net ProvidersSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25700849
PMCPMC4353277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.