ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
New onset stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and its relation to anatomical outcomes.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Urinary and sexual impact of pelvic reconstructive surgery for genital prolapse by surgical route. A randomized controlled trial.International urogynecology journal · 2022Trial
- De-Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Apical Prolapse Surgery: Potential Link with the Zone of Critical Elasticity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).International urogynecology journal · 2024Observational
- Laparoscopic pectopexy with native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Medium term anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.International urogynecology journal · 2022Review
- A new method of adjusting mesh tension using cystoscopy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Determining the risk factors and characteristics of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review.Turkish journal of urology · 2020Review
- Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.International urogynecology journal · 2020Review
- Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Clinical and urodynamic assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2017Article
- Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International neurourology journal · 2017Article
- Comparison of the Quality of Life and Female Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in Apical Prolapse Patients.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with versus without Concomitant Midurethral Sling: A 2-year Follow-up of Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to assess the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in continent women and its relation to postoperative prolapse stage.
methodsA total of 220 continent women with symptomatic apical prolapse who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy were prospectively evaluated; 100 women had previous hysterectomy. Patients were followed up at 3 and 12 months after surgery. All subjects completed the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and were examined using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary outcome measure was the number of women who developed new onset moderate/severe SUI at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and its relation to postoperative prolapse stage.
resultsAt 3 months, 52 women (23.6 %) developed moderate/severe SUI; 27 (12.2 %) had severe SUI. Eleven women (5.0 %) underwent surgery for SUI within 6 months of sacrocolpopexy. All surgery for SUI was in women who had post-hysterectomy sacrocolpopexy. Postoperatively, the vaginal apex (point C) was at stage 0/I in 195 cases (88.6 %). There were no differences in postoperative POP-Q stage of the anterior and apical vaginal walls between continent women and those with SUI (p = 0.45). The posterior vaginal wall was higher in women who developed de novo SUI (p = 0.03).
conclusionsThe incidence of SUI following apical prolapse repair is 23.6 %. Subsequent continence procedures were performed in 5.0 % of patients. All were in women who had previous hysterectomy making the risk in this group 11 %. Higher POP-Q stage of the posterior vaginal wall was associated with SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.